ARS-CoV-2 is the causal agent for COVID-19, and the World Health Organization classifies this virus as an airborne pathogen transmitted by asymptomatic, pre-symptomatic and symptomatic individuals through close contact via exposure to infected droplets and aerosols 1,2 . Although SARS-CoV-2 transmission can occur by activities involving the oral cavity, such as speaking, breathing, coughing, sneezing and even singing [3][4][5] , most attention has focused on the nasal-lung axis of infection 6 . Oral manifestations, such as taste loss, dry mouth and oral lesions, are evident in about half of COVID-19 cases [7][8][9] , although it remains unknown whether SARS-CoV-2 can directly infect and replicate in oral tissues, such as the salivary glands (SGs) or mucosa. This is critical because, if these are sites of early infection, they could play an important role in transmitting the virus to the lungs or the gastrointestinal tract via saliva, as has been suggested for other microbial-associated diseases, such as pneumonia 10 and inflammatory bowel diseases 11,12 (Extended Data Fig. 1a).SARS-CoV-2 uses host entry factors, such as ACE2 and TMPRSS family members (TMPRSS2 and TMPRSS4) 13,14 , and understanding the cell types that harbor these receptors is important for determining infection susceptibilities throughout the body [15][16][17] . ACE2 and TMPRSS2 expression has been reported in oral tissues 18,19 ; however, there are no comprehensive descriptions of viral entry factor expression nor direct confirmation of SARS-CoV-2 infection in oral tissues. We hypothesized that SGs and barrier epithelia of the oral cavity and oropharynx can be infected by SARS-CoV-2 and contribute to the transmission of SARS-CoV-2. To test this, we generated two human oral single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) atlases to predict cell-specific susceptibilities to SARS-CoV-2 infection. We confirmed ACE2 and TMPRSS expression in SGs and oral mucosa epithelia. SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed using autopsy and outpatient samples. Saliva from asymptomatic individuals with COVID-19 demonstrated the potential for viral transmission. In a prospective clinical cohort, we found a positive correlation between salivary viral load and taste loss; we also demonstrated persistent salivary antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid and spike proteins. ResultsOral tissue atlases reveal resident immune cells and niche-specific epithelial diversity. The SGs and the barrier mucosa of the oral cavity and oropharynx are likely gateways for viral infection, replication SARS-CoV-2 infection of the oral cavity and saliva

A set of proposals to rationalize and extend the taxonomy of the family Parvoviridae is currently under review by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV). Viruses in this family infect a wide range of hosts, as reflected by the longstanding division into two subfamilies: the Parvovirinae, which contains viruses that infect vertebrate hosts, and the Densovirinae, encompassing viruses that infect arthropod hosts. Using a modified definition for classification into the family that no longer demands isolation as long as the biological context is strong, but does require a near-complete DNA sequence, 134 new viruses and virus variants were identified. The proposals introduce new species and genera into both subfamilies, resolve one misclassified species, and improve taxonomic clarity by employing a series of systematic changes. These include identifying a precise level of sequence similarity required for viruses to belong to the same genus and decreasing the level of sequence similarity required for viruses to belong to the same species. These steps will facilitate recognition of the major phylogenetic branches within genera and eliminate the confusion caused by the near-identity of species and viruses. Changes to taxon nomenclature will establish numbered, non-Latinized binomial names for species, indicating genus affiliation and host range rather than recapitulating virus names. Also, affixes will be included in the names of genera to clarify subfamily affiliation and reduce the ambiguity that results from the vernacular use of “parvovirus” and “densovirus” to denote multiple taxon levels.

The glycoproteins (GP) of enveloped viruses facilitate entry into the host cell by interacting with specific cellular receptors. Despite extensive study, a cellular receptor for the deadly filoviruses Ebolavirus and Marburgvirus has yet to be identified and characterized. Here, we show that T-cell Ig and mucin domain 1 (TIM-1) binds to the receptor binding domain of the Zaire Ebola virus (EBOV) glycoprotein, and ectopic TIM-1 expression in poorly permissive cells enhances EBOV infection by 10-to 30-fold. Conversely, reduction of cell-surface expression of TIM-1 by RNAi decreased infection of highly permissive Vero cells. TIM-1 expression within the human body is broader than previously appreciated, with expression on mucosal epithelia from the trachea, cornea, and conjunctiva-tissues believed to be important during in vivo transmission of filoviruses. Recognition that TIM-1 serves as a receptor for filoviruses on these mucosal epithelial surfaces provides a mechanistic understanding of routes of entry into the human body via inhalation of aerosol particles or hand-to-eye contact. ARD5, a monoclonal antibody against the IgV domain of TIM-1, blocked EBOV binding and infection, suggesting that antibodies or small molecules directed against this cellular receptor may provide effective filovirus antivirals. viral entry | viral receptor | virion internalization T he Filoviridae family of viruses is composed of two genera, Ebolavirus and Marburgvirus, which cause hemorrhagic fever in humans and nonhuman primates. Infection with some strains of filoviruses causes fatality in 50-90% of human cases (1). The viral glycoprotein (GP) of Ebolavirus, which consists of surfaceexposed subunit GP1 attached to membrane-bound subunit GP2 by a disulfide bond (2), mediates binding to, penetration of, and fusion with host-cell membranes (3, 4). Pseudovirions bearing Ebolavirus GP transduce a broad range of cells through interactions that require the GP1 receptor-binding domain (RBD) (5-8). Upon internalization into low-pH endosomes, the filovirus GP1 is proteolyzed by cathepsins B and L, leading to GP2-dependent fusion of the viral and host membranes (9-12). Several proteins enhance filovirus entry in host cells, including the C-type lectins L-SIGN, DC-SIGN, and hMGL, as well as RhoB/C, integrin α5β1, folate receptor-α, and the tyrosine kinase receptor Axl (13-26); however, because none of these molecules has been shown to interact with the RBD of the filovirus GP1, it is unlikely that any of these proteins serve as a receptor for this family of viruses. Thus, we used gene correlation analysis to search for additional potential receptors. Here, we identify T-cell Ig and mucin domain 1 (TIM-1), which interacts with Zaire ebolavirus (EBOV) GP and enhances EBOV infection by 10-to 30-fold upon expression, providing strong evidence that TIM-1 serves as a receptor for EBOV. As we found that TIM-1 is expressed on a number of mucosal epithelial surfaces, we propose that TIM-1/ EBOV interactions may serve as a conduit for filovirus entry into ...