This review of orofacial malformations describes clefting anomalies that emanate from the mouth and lips. As the causes of orofacial clefts are better understood, it is becoming clear that a complex interplay between genetic and environmental variables causes these clefts. Future study of orofacial clefts will require increasingly sophisticated methods of elucidating these subtle interactions.

This study summarizes one of the lowest overall fistula rates reported in the literature. In a tertiary-care academic setting, plastic surgery residents can actively contribute to palatoplasty with a very low fistula rate. Technical keys to achieving low fistula rate include skeletonization of the vascular pedicle for medialization of the mucoperiosteal flaps, aggressive posterior repositioning of the levator muscle, and meticulous two-layer mattress-suture closure. We recommend Furlow repair for narrower clefts (less than 8 mm wide at the posterior border of the hard palate) and the Bardach two-flap palatoplasty for wider clefts.

Objective: To describe the conduct of the first multidisciplinary simulation-based workshop in the Middle East/North Africa region and evaluate participant satisfaction. Design: Cross-sectional survey-based evaluation. Setting: Educational comprehensive multidisciplinary simulation-based cleft care workshop. Participants: Total of 93 workshop participants from over 20 countries. Interventions: Three-day educational comprehensive multidisciplinary simulation-based cleft care workshop. Main Outcome Measures: Number of workshop participants, number of participants stratified by specialty, satisfaction with workshop, number of workshop staff, and number of workshop staff stratified by specialty. Results: The workshop included 93 participants from over 20 countries. The response rate was 47.3%, and participants reported high satisfaction with all aspects of the workshop. All participants reported they would recommend it to colleagues (100.0%) and participate again (100.0%). No significant difference was detected based on participant specialty or years of experience. The majority were unaware of other cleft practitioners in their countries (68.2%). Conclusion: Multidisciplinary simulation-based cleft care workshops are well received by cleft practitioners in developing countries, serve as a platform for intellectual exchange, and are only possible through strong collaborations. Advocates of international cleft surgery education should translate these successes from the regional to the global arena in order to contribute to sustainable cleft care through education.