The chromatic discrimination capabilities of 3- and 7-week-old infants were tested using 8 degrees, 417-, 448-, 486-, 540-, and 645-nm test fields embedded in a 547-nm surround and 486-nm test fields in a broadband red surround. In corroboration of earlier studies, few 3-week-old infants demonstrated chromatic discriminations, although their performance was somewhat better when one of the lights was long wavelength. Most 7-week-old infants could make chromatic discriminations, but they still demonstrated performance minima. The radiances of the test lights at the infants' performance minima were used to generate a spectral luminous efficiency curve. This curve agreed with both the adult heterochromatic brightness matches measured at 30 degrees of visual eccentricity in situ and the standard adult scotopic sensitivity curve V(lambda) over the short- and mid-wavelength range but deviated from both adult curves for the 645-nm test stimulus on a 547-nm surround. The results suggest that rod-initiated signals play a major role in infants' visual performance under the conditions tested.
Two theories of comparative judgment were compared across four experiments on their ability to explain the Baldwin figure, a focal line whose apparent length is affected by square boxes at or near its endpoints. Left-box size, right-box size, line length, line-box distance, and other variables were varied in factorial designs to allow application of functional measurement methodology. The model from adaptation level theory did poorly in several respects. In particular, it had trouble with the pervasive lack of contrast. Further, it could not account for the fact that a box added contralaterally increased the illusion, whereas the same box added ipsilaterally decreased the illusion. The model from information integration theory did substantially better, though it too had trouble with some of the results. An alternative interpretation was suggested in which the Baldwin figure is viewed as a positive context or assimilation effect. This positive context formulation may generalize to other illusions, such as those produced by the Müller-Lyer and Ponzo figures.
After viewing a suitable grating of vertical stripes for 5 minutes, subjects overestimated the width of a rectangle by 6 percent. The shifts in perception of size occurred whether individual stripes in the grating were narrower than, equal to, or wider than the rectangle. Rectangle width was underestimated only if the grating stripes were extremely wide, with a spatial frequency lower than most of the effective amplitude spectrum of the rectangle. These findings (and complementary ones with horizontal gratings) suggest that the visual system codes size on the basis of spatial frequency components, rather than directly in terms of width.
Previous studies have shown that red and green CRT lights that are approximately equiluminant for normal adults produce strong pupillary constrictions to both directions of exchange when one is suddenly substituted for the other. In contrast, protanopes and infants less than two months old show vigorous responses only to red → green exchanges and not to green → red exchanges of these lights. The current experiment presented red → green exchanges to three- and seven-week-old infants and to adult normals and protanopes. Among the lights tested were red-green pairs that were approximate scotopic, protanopic, and normal trichromatic matches. Protanopes and normals produced approximately equal pupillary constrictions at their respective brightness matches. The infants showed approximately equal pupillary constrictions at protanopic match luminances but quite asymmetric responses at the scotopic and normal match luminances.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.