SUMMARY1. Visual resolving power is known to be poorer for objects oriented obliquely as compared with horizontal and vertical orientations. Experiments were designed to evaluate the optical and neurophysiological factors involved.2. Gratings with a sinusoidal light distribution were generated on the face of an oscilloscope. Spatial frequency and contrast could be varied while keeping the mean luminance of the grating constant.3. Using a homatropinized eye with an artificial pupil and carefully corrected refraction, high resolution in the vertical and horizontal meridians as compared with the oblique meridians was found for gratings ranging in spatial frequency from 1 to 35 c/deg. 4. It is concluded from the similar behaviour of low and high frequency gratings that neither focus errors nor optical aniseikonia can account for these findings.5. Additional proof that optical factors cannot significantly account for these preferred directions of resolution was obtained by forming interference fringes directly on the retina using a neon-helium laser as a coherent light source.6. Similar orientational changes in resolution were found by bypassing the dioptrics with interference fringes. It is concluded that the effect is due to some orientational inequality in the visual nervous system.

At night efferent optic nerve activity generated by a circadian clock in the Limulus brain changes the structure of the photoreceptor and surrounding pigment cells in the animal's lateral eyes. The structural changes allow each ommatidium to gather light from a wider area at night than during the day. Visual sensitivity is thereby increased, but spatial resolution is diminished. At daybreak efferent activity from the clock stops, the structural changes reverse, and the field of view of each ommatidium decreases. The cyclic changes are endogenous and continue in the dark. Thus, under the control of a circadian clock, the Limulus eye exchanges its daytime acuity for greater sensitivity at night.

SUMMARY1. Using experimental curves relating the threshold contrast of sinusoidal grating patterns to their spatial frequency, the expected threshold contrast curves for three aperiodic patterns, viz. a single half-cycle sinusoid bar, a single full-cycle sinusoid bar, and the boundary between an extended sinusoidal grating and a 50 % grey surround, are calculated. In this calculation the assumption is made that the system is linear near the threshold.2. Experiments are described in which the actual threshold contrast curves are determined for these aperiodic patterns by three observers. The patterns were generated on the face of an oscilloscope and could be varied in size and contrast.3. These experimental curves agree well with the predictions in the high frequency region (i.e. above about 10 c/deg), but below this various complicating factors restrict the validity of the calculations.4. Thus there is no reason to suppose that a linear theory cannot be used to predict visibility of aperiodic patterns near threshold.

Previously we reported that failures of compensatory eye movements led to appreciable binocular retinal image motion during head rotation. Subjectively, the visual world appeared clear, fused, and stable under these conditions. The present experiments examined these impressions psychophysically. The spatial modulation transfer function of subjects with known retinal image motion was measured during head rotation. We found that contrast sensitivity was reduced for gratings over 6 cycles/degree and was increased for lower spatial frequencies. Our results, when compared with Kelly's [J. Opt. Soc. Am. 69, 1340-1349 (1979)] measurements made with artificially moving stabilized gratings, show that natural retinal image motion is less harmful to contrast sensitivity at high spatial frequencies and more beneficial at low spatial frequencies. Furthermore, we had previously found that natural retinal image motion was different in each eye during head movement but no diplopia was noticed. We confirmed this subjective impression by measuring forced-choice stereoacuity thresholds concurrent with binocular head and eye recordings. Stereoacuity was not disturbed by large fixation disparities or high vergence velocities. Recordings also were made while a fused Julesz stereogram was viewed during attempts to break fusion with violent head movements. Fusion could not be broken. Stereograms turned on during violent head movement fused rapidly. We conclude that vision is better with natural retinal image motion than expected from experiments done with stabilized heads.

Flicker waveform has been found to have a slight but specific effect upon fusion threshold. A depression of threshold amplitude of about 30 percent occurs if a second harmonic of near-threshold amplitude is added to the fundamental. The magnitude of the depression depends critically on the relative phase of the two components of the waveform.