Floating spar platforms are widely used in the Gulf of Mexico for oil production. The spar is a bluff, vertical cylinder which is subject to Vortex Induced Motions (VIM) when current velocities exceed a few knots. All spars to date have been constructed with helical strakes to mitigate VIM in order to reduce the loads on the risers and moorings. Model tests have indicated that the effectiveness of these strakes is influenced greatly by details of their design, by appurtenances placed on the outside of the hull and by current direction. At this time there is limited full scale data to validate the model test results and little understanding of the mechanisms at work in strake performance. The authors have been investigating the use of CFD as a means for predicting full scale VIM performance and for facilitating the design of spars for reduced VIM. This paper reports on the results of a study to benchmark the CFD results for a truss spar with a set of model experiments carried out in a towing tank. The focus is on the effect of current direction, reduced velocity and strake pitch on the VIM response. The tests were carried out on a 1:40 scale model of an actual truss spar design, and all computations were carried out at model scale. Future study will consider the effect of external appurtenances on the hull and scale-up to full scale Reynolds’ numbers on the results.
A production spar designed for West African (WA) offshore conditions must consider possible resonance with long period swell, which might result in large amplitude heave oscillations. Preliminary study of a classic spar with diameter of 39 m (128 ft) and draft 198 m (650 ft) for a WA application led the authors to believe that excessive heave response of 5.2 m (17 ft) may occur at the natural period of 28 seconds. This led the team to investigate the possibility of adding a heave plate (circular disk) at the base of the spar to control the response to within 3.1 m (10 ft), which is the limit set by a typical compensation system. Important design issues arose with regards to the geometry of the plate, i.e. diameter and thickness. Numerical simulations and model testing were used to identify the influence of a heave plate on the heave response of the spar. Heave response for various diameters and thickness were investigated. Comparison of added mass and damping values were found to be in reasonable agreement. Issues such as effect of a centerwell and moorings, plate cutouts for ease of transportation were also investigated. Discussion of the experimental results and comparison with numerical simulations are presented in this paper, and some recommendations are made on optimum heave plate geometry.
The response of a combined dynamic system consisting of a Spar, a mooring line system, and top tension risers is presented. The top tension of a riser is provided by a buoyancy can that is laterally supported by a preloaded compliant guide. The overall system is nonlinear due to the mooring line restoring force, the friction between the buoyancy cans and the compliant guides, and the friction between the risers and the guides at the Spar keel. The friction between the Spar and the riser system is captured by a Coulomb model, whereas the stiffness of the mooring line system is accounted for by using a regression analysis of pertinent load versus displacement data. The combined model is numerically integrated using input time histories of force and moment that are compatible with a random representation (Jonswap spectrum) of a typical extreme environmental loading in the Gulf of Mexico. The input time histories of the force and the moment for the combined model are obtained at the center of gravity of the Spar by using a standard motion analysis program (MLTSIM). The numerical results of the time domain analysis of the combined model, in conjunction with ergodicity, are used for an associated Monte Carlo study. The Monte Carlo study provides useful information regarding the probability densities and the power spectra of various response components of the combined system. These results serve as a benchmark for additional analytical studies that use the technique of statistical linearization to derive equivalent linear stiffness and damping coefficients for the combined system.
Helical strakes are used to suppress the Vortex-Induced Motion of Truss Spars. Model experiments have demonstrated the efficiency of strakes in the Truss Spar design but also indicate that the VIM response is sensitive to the details of strake design and placement of appurtenances around the Spar hull. It is desirable to study these hydrodynamic effects using CFD. The following paper is a continuation of some of the earlier CFD simulations on this subject (see, J. Halkyard, et al., "Benchmarking of Truss Spar Vortex-Induced Motions Derived from CFD with Experiments", Proceedings of OMAE'05). This paper in particular deals with the effect of holes in the strakes and appurtenances and their placement. All the simulations were done at model scale (1:40 scale model of an actual Truss Spar design) to compare the motions with experimental results. Mesh sensitivity and turbulence modeling issues are also discussed. Calculations were done using general purpose CFD code Acusolve TM .
Spar production systems are subject to Vortex Induced Motions (VIM) which may impact mooring and riser design. Helical strakes are employed to mitigate VIM. Model tests are typically required to validate the performance of the strakes. This paper will report on the results of benchmarking studies that have been conducted over the past few years to compare model tests with computational fluid dynamics (CFD). The paper discusses comparisons of CFD with model tests, “best practices” for the use of CFD for these classes of problems and issues related to turbulence modeling and meshing of problems at large Reynold’s numbers. This work is ongoing.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.