No abstract

SummaryCalibrated automated thrombography (CAT) enables continuous measurement of thrombin generation (TG). Initial clinical studies using the CAT method showed large variability of normal values, indicating the necessity for a standardized CAT protocol. This international study assessed the intra-and inter-assay imprecision of CAT as well as the inter-centre variability of results in five European centres using locally available reagents and conditions (study 1) and a standardized protocol in which results were normalized (study 2). Samples with and without corn trypsin inhibitor from six healthy volunteers, two haemophilia patients and one protein C deficient patient were assayed. Study 1 confirmed that the use of different sources and concentrations of tissue factor (TF) and different phospholipid (PL) mixtures produced large variability in results. The second study demonstrated that, using the same source and concentration of TF, PL and the same test procedure, this variability could be significantly reduced. Normalization of results improved the inter-centre variability. The benefit of contact factor inhibition prior to TG measurement was confirmed. These results demonstrated that standardization of CAT reduces the variability of results to acceptable limits. Standardization and normalization should be considered in future clinical studies which apply TG testing to clinical decision making.

Summary. Background: Evidence suggests the wide variation in platelet response within the population is genetically controlled. Unraveling the complex relationship between sequence variation and platelet phenotype requires accurate and reproducible measurement of platelet response. Objective: To develop a methodology suitable for measuring signaling pathway-specific platelet phenotype, to use this to measure platelet response in a large cohort, and to demonstrate the effect size of sequence variation in a relevant model gene. Methods: Three established platelet assays were evaluated: mobilization of [Ca 2+ ] i , aggregometry and flow cytometry, each in response to adenosine 5¢-diphosphate (ADP) or the glycoprotein (GP) VI-specific crosslinked collagen-related peptide (CRP). Flow cytometric measurement of fibrinogen binding and P-selectin expression in response to a single, intermediate dose of each agonist gave the best combination of reproducibility and inter-individual variability and was used to measure the platelet response in 506 healthy volunteers. Pathway specificity was ensured by blocking the main subsidiary signaling pathways. Results: Individuals were identified who were hypo-or hyper-responders for both pathways, or who had differential responses to the two agonists, or between outcomes. 89 individuals, retested three months later using the same methodology, showed high concordance between the two visits in all four assays (r 2 = 0.872, 0.868, 0.766 and 0.549); all subjects retaining their phenotype at recall.The effect of sequence variation at the GP6 locus accounted for 35% of the variation in the CRP-XL response. Conclusion: Genotyping-phenotype association studies in a well-characterized, large cohort provides a powerful strategy to measure the effect of sequence variation in genes regulating the platelet response.

No abstract

The molecular basis for the anticoagulant action of heparin lies in its ability to bind to and enhance the inhibitory activity of the plasma protein antithrombin against several serine proteases of the coagulation system, most importantly factors IIa (thrombin), Xa and IXa. Two major mechanisms underlie heparin's potentiation of antithrombin. The conformational changes induced by heparin binding cause both expulsion of the reactive loop and exposure of exosites of the surface of antithrombin, which bind directly to the enzyme target; and a template mechanism exists in which both inhibitor and enzyme bind to the same heparin molecule. The relative importance of these two modes of action varies between enzymes. In addition, heparin can act through other serine protease inhibitors such as heparin co-factor II, protein C inhibitor and tissue factor plasminogen inhibitor. The antithrombotic action of heparin in vivo, though dominated by anticoagulant mechanisms, is more complex, and interactions with other plasma proteins and cells play significant roles in the living vasculature.