To determine whether non-human adenovirus-specific antibodies are cross-neutralizing, rabbit and mouse anti-human adenovirus type 5 (HAd5), anti-bovine adenovirus type 3 (BAd3), and anti-porcine adenovirus type 3 (PAd3) sera were used in cross-virus neutralization assays. Adenovirus neutralizing antibodies were found to be virus-specific, suggesting that virus neutralizing epitope differs significantly in HAd5, BAd3, and PAd3. To further investigate whether immunity to an HAd5-derived vector could be circumvented by the use of non-human adenoviruses in vivo, mice were first immunized either intranasally or intraperitoneally with HAd5, BAd3, PAd3, or BAd3 + PAd3, and after development of adenovirus-specific antibodies, animals were inoculated with the HAd5 recombinant (AdCA36lacZ) containing the bacterial beta-galactosidase gene under the control of murine cytomegalovirus immediate-early promoter. Virus-inoculated animals developed virus-specific IgG and IgA antibodies. LacZ expression in animals initially primed with HAd5 was significantly reduced (P < 0.05), suggesting that the immune response against the vector could prevent the transgene expression following subsequent inoculation of the same vector, whereas LacZ expression in mice initially primed with BAd3, PAd3, or BAd3 + PAd3 was significantly higher (P > 0.05) than that obtained in HAd5-primed animals. Our results suggest that HAd5-, BAd3-, or PAd3-based vectors may be used sequentially for human gene therapy or vaccine production as a means to avoid immunity to the vector.

Pre-existing immunity against adenoviruses may compromise the efficacy of adenoviral vectors for vaccination and gene therapy. The purpose of this study was to determine whether encapsulation of adenovirus recombinants into biodegradable alginate microparticles could circumvent the vector-specific immune response. Mice were immunized either intranasally (i.n.) or intraperitoneally (i.p.) with human adenovirus type 5 (HAd5), resulting in the development of virus-specific antibodies. Immunized and naïve mice were inoculated with AdCA36lacZ (an E1-deleted HAd5 recombinant containing the bacterial b-galactosidase (LacZ) gene), encapsulated (E) into alginate microparticles, or nonencapsulated (NE) ie, as a virus suspension. LacZ expression in animals immunized once (1 Â ) or twice (2 Â ) with HAd5 and subsequently inoculated with NE-AdCA36lacZ (NE-Z) was significantly (Po0.001) reduced compared to those levels observed in NE-Z inoculated naïve mice, suggesting that the immune response against the vector adversely affected transgene expression. In contrast, there was only slight reduction (P40.05) in LacZ expression in mice immunized 1 Â or 2 Â with HAd5 that were subsequently inoculated with E-AdCA36lacZ (E-Z) compared to those levels obtained in E-Z inoculated naïve animals. Similar results were obtained with i.n. or i.p. inoculated animals. These results indicate that microencapsulation of recombinant adenovirus effectively circumvented the vector-specific immune response.

Illumina and nanopore sequencing technologies are powerful tools that can be used to determine the bacterial composition of complex microbial communities. In this study, we compared nasal microbiota results at genus level using both Illumina and nanopore 16S rRNA gene sequencing. We also monitored the progression of nanopore sequencing in the accurate identification of species, using pure, single species cultures, and evaluated the performance of the nanopore EPI2ME 16S data analysis pipeline. Fifty-nine nasal swabs were sequenced using Illumina MiSeq and Oxford Nanopore 16S rRNA gene sequencing technologies. In addition, five pure cultures of relevant bacterial species were sequenced with the nanopore sequencing technology. The Illumina MiSeq sequence data were processed using bioinformatics modules present in the Mothur software package. Albacore and Guppy base calling, a workflow in nanopore EPI2ME (Oxford Nanopore Technologies—ONT, Oxford, UK) and an in-house developed bioinformatics script were used to analyze the nanopore data. At genus level, similar bacterial diversity profiles were found, and five main and established genera were identified by both platforms. However, probably due to mismatching of the nanopore sequence primers, the nanopore sequencing platform identified Corynebacterium in much lower abundance compared to Illumina sequencing. Further, when using default settings in the EPI2ME workflow, almost all sequence reads that seem to belong to the bacterial genus Dolosigranulum and a considerable part to the genus Haemophilus were only identified at family level. Nanopore sequencing of single species cultures demonstrated at least 88% accurate identification of the species at genus and species level for 4/5 strains tested, including improvements in accurate sequence read identification when the basecaller Guppy and Albacore, and when flowcell versions R9.4 (Oxford Nanopore Technologies—ONT, Oxford, UK) and R9.2 (Oxford Nanopore Technologies—ONT, Oxford, UK) were compared. In conclusion, the current study shows that the nanopore sequencing platform is comparable with the Illumina platform in detection bacterial genera of the nasal microbiota, but the nanopore platform does have problems in detecting bacteria within the genus Corynebacterium. Although advances are being made, thorough validation of the nanopore platform is still recommendable.

No abstract