Objectives We propose new classification criteria for Sjögren’s Syndrome (SS), which are needed considering the emergence of biological agents as potential treatments and their associated co-morbidity. These criteria target individuals with signs/symptoms suggestive of SS. Methods Criteria are based on expert opinion elicited using the Nominal Group Technique, and analyses of data from the Sjögren’s International Collaborative Clinical Alliance. Preliminary criteria validation included comparisons with classifications based on the American-European-Consensus-Group (AECG) criteria, a model-based “gold standard” obtained from Latent Class Analysis (LCA) of data from a range of diagnostic tests, and a comparison with cases and controls collected from sources external to the population used for criteria development Results Validation results indicate high levels of sensitivity and specificity for the criteria. Case definition requires at least 2 out of the following 3: Positive serum anti-SSA and/or anti-SSB or [positive rheumatoid factor and ANA ≥ 1:320]; Ocular staining score ≥ 3; Presence of focal lymphocytic sialadenitis with focus score ≥ 1 focus/4mm2 in labial salivary gland biopsies. Observed agreement with the AECG criteria is high when these are applied using all objective tests. However, AECG classification based on allowable substitutions of symptoms for objective tests results in poor agreement with the proposed and LCA-derived classifications. Conclusion These classification criteria developed from registry data collected using standardized measures are based on objective tests. Validation indicates improved classification performance relative to existing alternatives, making them more suitable for application in situations where misclassification may present health risks.

Aims/background-To determine the epidemiological characteristics and risk factors predisposing to corneal ulceration in Madurai, south India, and to identify the specific pathogenic organisms responsible for infection. Methods-All patients with suspected infectious central corneal ulceration presenting to the ocular microbiology and cornea service at Aravind Eye Hospital, Madurai, from 1 January to 31 March 1994 were evaluated. Sociodemographic data and information pertaining to risk factors were recorded, all patients were examined, and corneal cultures and scrapings were performed. Conclusions-Central corneal ulceration is a common problem in south India and most often occurs after a superficial corneal injury with organic material. Bacterial and fungal infections occur in equal numbers with Streptococcus pneumoniae accounting for the majority of bacterial ulcers and Fusarium spp responsible for most of the fungal infections. These findings have important public health implications for the treatment and prevention of corneal ulceration in the developing world. (Br J Ophthalmol 1997;81:965-971) Central corneal ulceration is a major cause of monocular blindness in developing countries. Surveys in Africa and Asia have confirmed this finding, 1-6 and a recent report on the causes of blindness worldwide consistently lists corneal scarring second only to cataract as the major aetiology of blindness and visual disability in many of the developing nations in Asia, Africa, and the Middle East. Results-In

No abstract

No abstract