The binding of the carotenoid astaxanthin (AXT) in the protein multimacromolecular complex crustacyanin (CR) is responsible for the blue coloration of lobster shell. The structural basis of the bathochromic shift mechanism has long been elusive. A change in color occurs from the orange red of the unbound dilute AXT (max 472 nm in hexane), the well-known color of cooked lobster, to slate blue in the protein-bound live lobster state (max 632 nm in CR). Intriguingly, extracted CR becomes red on dehydration and on rehydration goes back to blue. Recently, the innovative use of softer x-rays and xenon derivatization yielded the threedimensional structure of the A 1 apoprotein subunit of CR, confirming it as a member of the lipocalin superfamily. That work provided the molecular replacement search model for a crystal form of the ␤-CR holo complex, that is an A1 with A3 subunit assembly including two bound AXT molecules. We have thereby determined the structure of the A3 molecule de novo. Lobster has clearly evolved an intricate structural mechanism for the coloration of its shell using AXT and a bathochromic shift. Blue͞purple AXT proteins are ubiquitous among invertebrate marine animals, particularly the Crustacea. The three-dimensional structure of ␤-CR has identified the protein contacts and structural alterations needed for the AXT color regulation mechanism.T he bathochromic shift of the absorption by astaxanthin (AXT) (3,3Ј-dihydroxy-␤,␤Ј-carotene-4,4Ј-dione; Fig. 1) in lobster crustacyanin (CR) has intrigued scientists for over 50 years (1-4). The visible absorption spectra of free dilute AXT, of ␤-and ␣-CR peak at 472 nm in hexane or 492 nm in pyridine, 580 and 632 nm, respectively (2). Detailed chemical studies involving reconstitution with natural and chemically synthesized carotenoids (4) have established the essential chemical characteristics required for this bathochromic shift effect, which arises from a reduced energy gap between ground and excited states. Keto groups are needed at positions 4 and 4Ј, conjugated with the polyene chain; methyl groups are needed at the central positions C20 and C20Ј; only E (all trans) isomers are bound to the protein; and no great variation in overall shape and size of the carotenoid is tolerated. The visible CD spectrum of ␤-CR, attributed to helical twisting of the chromophore, shows exciton splitting indicating that the two AXTs are proximal (2, 4). The lowered CϭC of AXT in the resonance Raman spectra of the CRs, indicative of increased electron delocalization in the electronic ground state, has been attributed to polarization of the -electron system by proximal charge groups or hydrogen bonds (3). These spectra argue against a large protein-induced distortion of the polyene chain, although minor changes to its geometry would be required to explain the spectra (3, 4). 13 C magic angle spinning NMR, together with Stark spectroscopy, gives support to an essentially symmetrical polarization of the AXT in CR with some asymmetry superimposed on the two halves of the chromo...

A complex of concanavalin A with methyl alpha‐D‐mannopyranoside has been crystallized in space group P212121 with a = 123.9 A, b = 129.1 A and c = 67.5 A. X‐ray diffraction intensities to 2.9 A resolution have been collected on a Xentronics/Nicolet area detector. The structure has been solved by molecular replacement where the starting model was based on refined coordinates of an I222 crystal of saccharide‐free concanavalin A. The structure of the saccharide complex was refined by restrained least‐squares methods to an R‐factor value of 0.19. In this crystal form, the asymmetric unit contains four protein subunits, to each of which a molecule of mannoside is bound in a shallow crevice near the surface of the protein. The methyl alpha‐D‐mannopyranoside molecule is bound in the C1 chair conformation 8.7 A from the calcium‐binding site and 12.8 A from the transition metal‐binding site. A network of seven hydrogen bonds connects oxygen atoms O‐3, O‐4, O‐5 and O‐6 of the mannoside to residues Asn14, Leu99, Tyr100, Asp208 and Arg228. O‐2 and O‐1 of the mannoside extend into the solvent. O‐2 is hydrogen‐bonded through a water molecule to an adjacent asymmetric unit. O‐1 is not involved in any hydrogen bond and there is no fixed position for its methyl substituent.

Crystallographic and computational methods have been used to study the binding of two monosaccharides (glucoside and mannoside) to concanavalin-A. The 2 structure of glucoside bound concanavalin-A is reported and compared with the 2 Ó Ó structure of the mannoside complex. The interaction energies of the substrate in each crystallographic subunit were calculated by molecular mechanics and found to be essentially the same for both sugars. Further energy minimisation of the active site region of the subunits did not alter this conclusion. Information from crystallographic B-factors was interpreted in terms of mobility of the sugars in the combining site. Molecular dynamics (MD) was employed to investigate mobility of the ligands at the binding sites. Switching between di †erent binding states was observed for mannoside over the ensemble in line with the crystallographic B-factors. A calculated average interaction energy was found to be more favourable for mannoside than glucoside, by 4.9 ^3.6 kcal mol~1 (comparable with the experimentally determined binding energy di †erence of 1.6 ^0.3 kcal mol~1). However, on consideration of all terms contributing to the binding enthalpy a di †erence is not found. This work demonstrates the difficulty in relating structure to thermodynamic properties, but suggests that dynamic models are needed to provide a more complete picture of ligandÈreceptor interactions.