Hybrid/virtual field trips created for introductory and advanced soil science courses Students found the hybrid/virtual field trips informative, interesting and enjoyable Students liked the flexibility of the virtual format 42% preferred a virtual field trip while 39% preferred an in-person field trip Virtualizing Soil Science Field Trips

In general, remote sensing studies assessing cover crop growth are species nonspecific, use imagery from satellites or modified unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), and rely on multispectral vegetation indexes (VIs). However, using RGB imagery and visible-spectrum VIs from commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) UAVs to assess species specific cover crop growth is limited in the current scientific literature. Thus, this study evaluated RGB imagery and visible-spectrum VIs from COTS UAVs for suitability to estimate concentration (%) and content (kg ha−1) based cereal rye (CR) biomass, carbon (C), nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), and sulfur (S). UAV surveys were conducted at two fields in Indiana and evaluated five visible-spectrum VIs—Visible Atmospherically Resistant Index (VARI), Green Leaf Index (GLI), Modified Green Red Vegetation Index (MGRVI), Red Green Blue Vegetation Index (RGBVI), and Excess of Greenness (ExG). This study utilized simple linear regression (VI only) and stepwise multiple regression (VI with weather and geographic data) to produce individual models for estimating CR biomass, C, N, P, K, and S concentration and content. The goodness-of-fit statistics were generated using repeated K-fold cross-validation to compare individual model performance. In general, the models developed using simple linear regression were inferior to those developed using the multiple stepwise regression method. Furthermore, for models developed using the multiple stepwise regression method all five VIs performed similarly when estimating concentration-based CR variables; however, when estimating content-based CR variables the models developed with GLI, MGRVI, and RGBVI performed similarly explaining 74–81% of the variation in CR data, and outperformed VARI and ExG. However, on an individual field basis, MGRVI consistently outperformed GLI and RGBVI for all CR characteristics. This study demonstrates the potential to utilize COTS UAVs for estimating in-field CR characteristics; however, the models generated in this study need further development to expand geographic scope and incorporate additional abiotic factors.