Numerical weather prediction (NWP) models are limited with respect to initial and boundary condition data and possess an incomplete description of underlying physical processes. To account for this, modelers have adopted the method of ensemble prediction to quantify the uncertainty within a model framework; however, the generation of ensemble members requires considerably more computational time and/or resources than a single deterministic simulation, especially at convection-allowing horizontal grid spacings. One approach to solving this issue is the development of both a large and small horizontal grid spacing model framework over the same domain for ensemble and deterministic simulations, respectively. This approach assumes that model grid spacing has no influence on model uncertainty; therefore, the objective of this paper is to quantify the influence of horizontal grid spacing on the statistical spread of NWP model ensembles over a regional domain. A series of 24-h simulations using the Weather Research and Forecast (WRF) Model are generated over a static domain with horizontal grid spacings of 35, 25, 15, and 9 km, using both a stochastic kinetic energy backscatter scheme and a multiphysics ensemble approach. Results indicate that horizontal grid spacing does influence the magnitude of uncertainty within an ensemble, although the exact magnitude and type of statistical relationship (direct versus inverse) varies by case. As such, at shorter lead times (<12 h) the dominant atmospheric process associated with each event and the type of ensemble being used outweigh the individual impacts of horizontal grid spacing on ensemble spread.

Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.ii REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number.

Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.ii REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number.

No abstract

The combination of techniques that incorporate observational data may improve numerical weather prediction forecasts; thus, in this study, the methodology and potential value of one such combination were investigated. A series of experiments on a single case day was used to explore a 3DVAR-based technique (the variational version of the Local Analysis and Prediction System; vLAPS) in combination with Newtonian relaxation (observation and analysis nudging) for simulating moist convection in the Advanced Research version of the Weather Research and Forecasting model. Experiments were carried out with various combinations of vLAPS and nudging for a series of forecast start times. A limited subjective analysis of reflectivity suggested all experiments generally performed similarly in reproducing the overall convective structures. Objective verification indicated that applying vLAPS analyses without nudging performs best during the 0–2 h forecast in terms of placement of moist convection but worst in the 3–5 h forecast and quickly develops the most substantial overforecast bias. The analyses used for analysis nudging were at much finer temporal and spatial scales than usually used in pre-forecast analysis nudging, and the results suggest that further research is needed on how to best apply analysis nudging of analyses at these scales.