Background COVID-19, SARS and MERS are diseases that present an important health burden worldwide. This situation demands resource allocation to the healthcare system, affecting especially middle- and low-income countries. Thus, identifying the main cost drivers is relevant to optimize patient care and resource allocation. Objective To systematically identify and summarize the current status of knowledge on direct medical hospitalization costs of SARS, MERS, or COVID-19 in Upper-Middle-Income Countries. Methods We conducted a systematic review across seven key databases (PubMed, EMBASE, BVS Portal, CINAHL, CRD library, MedRxiv and Research Square) from database inception to February 2021. Costs extracted were converted into 2021 International Dollars using the Purchasing Power Parity-adjusted. The assessment of quality was based on the protocol by the BMJ and CHEERS. PROSPERO 2020: CRD42020225757. Results No eligible study about SARS or MERS was recovered. For COVID-19, five studies presented cost analysis performed in Brazil, China, Iran, and Turkey. Regarding total direct medical costs, the lowest cost per patient at ward was observed in Turkey ($900.08), while the highest in Brazil ($5,093.38). At ICU, the lowest was in Turkey ($2,984.78), while the highest was in China ($52,432.87). Service care was the most expressive (58% to 88%) cost driver of COVID-19 patients at ward. At ICU, there was no consensus between service care (54% to 87%) and treatment (72% to 81%) as key burdens of total cost. Conclusion Our findings elucidate the importance of COVID-19 on health-economic outcomes. The marked heterogeneity among studies leaded to substantially different results and made challenging the comparison of data to estimate pooled results for single countries or regions. Further studies concerning cost estimates from standardized analysis may provide clearer data for a more substantial analysis. This may help care providers and policy makers to organize care for patients in the most efficient way.

No abstract

Objetivo: Definir um limiar de custo para o sistema intrauterino liberador de levonorgestrel 52 mg (SIU-LNG 52 mg) para o tratamento do sangramento uterino anormal (SUA) sob a perspectiva do Sistema de Saúde Suplementar brasileiro. Métodos: Foi elaborado um modelo de custo-efetividade para definir o limiar de custo de inserção de SIU-LNG 52 mg em mulheres com SUA em comparação à histerectomia. Um modelo de Markov foi estruturado com ciclos anuais para reproduzir o tratamento do SUA em um e cinco anos, considerando custos médicos diretos e o percentual de histerectomias evitadas como desfecho. O custo da histerectomia foi variado até o valor de 10.000 reais brasileiros (BRL) com incrementos de 500 BRL a cada nova simulação para avaliar o limiar de custo do SIU-LNG 52 mg para igualar o custo total de tratamento de ambas as estratégias analisadas. Resultados: O SIU-LNG 52 mg demonstrou ser uma opção de tratamento dominante quando comparada à histerectomia, levando à redução da frequência de realização do procedimento cirúrgico em 59,62% das mulheres e redução de 2.557,91 BRL no custo total de tratamento em cinco anos. Ao considerar a histerectomia a 6.000 BRL, o custo do procedimento com SIU-LNG 52 mg poderia ser de até 6.150,35 BRL e 3.994,60 BRL para igualar o custo total de tratamento, em horizontes temporais de um e cinco anos, respectivamente. Conclusão: SIU-LNG 52 mg demonstrou ser uma opção dominante para o manejo do SUA, sendo capaz de atrelar economia para o sistema de saúde a benefícios para a mulher perante a cirurgia.

No abstract

No abstract