Several studies have shown that elevated levels of certain heavy metals may affect the behavior of birds and mammals. However, most of these studies were carried out under controlled laboratory conditions; results from free-living populations are scarce. In this study we examined the possible effects of exposure to high heavy metal concentrations on the aggressive behavior of resident great tit (Parus major) males by means of simulated territorial intrusion experiments during the egg-laying and incubation period at a highly polluted and a reference site. We also examined the effects of heavy metal exposure on the breeding performance of the tested couples, and we examined the plasma testosterone concentrations of great tit males in both study sites. We found no significant differences in the aggressive behavior between great tits at the polluted and the reference site during the egg-laying period. During the incubation period, responding male great tits at the polluted site performed significantly more aggressive flights around the decoy than did males at the reference site. During this period, there was also a tendency that more responding males were out of sight of the observer for some time during the experiment at the reference site than at the polluted site and this also for a longer period of time. Other behavioral parameters did not differ significantly between the two sites. Although plasma testosterone levels were higher at the polluted site, they did not differ significantly between the two sites. The tested couples at the polluted site interrupted their laying sequence significantly more and hatching success was significantly reduced compared to the tested birds at the reference site. We found no significant difference in clutch size, the length of the laying interruptions, fledging success, and fledgling age between the two sites. Although our results showed only minor alterations in the territorial aggressive behavior of male great tits exposed to heavy metal pollution, these small changes may have an important influence on the breeding and survival of these birds.
We investigated the effects of environmental pollution on genetic damage in wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus) by means of the comet assay, with special attention to the role of age and gender as potential confounding variables. The present study was carried out at four sites along a pollution gradient in the vicinity of Antwerp (Belgium), with a nonferrous smelter as the main pollution source. We measured the concentration of heavy metals (Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn, Pb, and Zn) in mouse liver and kidney and the concentration of organochlorine compounds (polychlorinated biphenyls and 1,1-dichloro-2,2-bis(p-chlorophenyl)ethylene) in mouse muscle tissue to assess individual exposure. Cadmium exposure was very high at the sites closest to the smelter, and exposure to this metal decreased with increasing distance from the smelter. Exposure to the other pollutants was low to moderate at the different sites. Genetic damage was higher in mice from populations in the vicinity of the nonferrous smelter compared with that in the control populations. A significant increase in genetic damage with age was observed at the most polluted sites, but not at the control sites. Genetic damage was higher in male mice than in female mice at the most polluted site, but not at the other areas. Yet, no obvious relationship was found between individual pollutant levels and individual genetic damage levels. We conclude that the comet assay can be used to compare genotoxicity at the population level if the confounding variables of gender and age are taken into account. However, its use for individual health risk assessment remains questionable.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.