WBI can facilitate removal of select toxicants from the gastrointestinal tract in some patients, but there is no convincing evidence from clinical studies that it improves the outcome of poisoned patients. There is no new evidence that would require a major revision of the conclusions of the 2004 position statement.
In northern Vietnam, a majority of severely envenomed patients are bitten by Bungarus multicinctus. Hitherto, these victims have received supportive care only. The aims of this study were to assess the possible efficacy and side effects of a new antivenom. This trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00811239) was performed during [2004][2005][2006] at an ICU in Hanoi. For ethical reasons, the study was not randomized. All patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria during 2004-2005 were prospectively enrolled, carefully recorded, and treated with optimal supportive therapy (control group). The patients who entered the study 2006 were treated with antivenom in addition to supportive care (antivenom group). The inclusion criteria were: envenomation by B. multicinctus, presence of systemic envenomation, and (during 2006) provision of written informed consent. Predefined endpoints were number of patients requiring mechanical ventilation, duration of mechanical ventilation, length of ICU stay, duration of muscle paralysis, and number of patients with ventilatorassociated pneumonia. Eighty-one patients were included, 54 during 2004-2005 and 27 during 2006. Baseline characteristics were similar in the groups. The antivenomgroup patients had a shorter duration of muscle paralysis of the limbs (p<0.001), of the diaphragm (p<0.001), and of ptosis (p<0.001). The duration of mechanical ventilation and length of ICU stay were shorter in the antivenom group (p<0.001). The rate of ventilator-associated pneumonia was lower in the antivenom group (p<0.02). However, the relative number of patients requiring mechanical ventilation was not reduced in the antivenom group. The rate of adverse reactions to the antivenom was 7.4%. A favorable efficacy and acceptable safety of this antivenom were demonstrated.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.