1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(97)00964-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Different Echocardiographic Methods With Radionuclide Imaging for Measuring Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction During Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated by Thrombolytic Therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

11
111
1
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
11
111
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Both M-mode and two-dimensional methodologies were used. Values for systolic function (SFN), expressed as ejection fraction (EF) (22,23 ), were categorized into four classes with interclass limits of 30%, 40%, and 50%. A semiquantitative method of assessment was used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both M-mode and two-dimensional methodologies were used. Values for systolic function (SFN), expressed as ejection fraction (EF) (22,23 ), were categorized into four classes with interclass limits of 30%, 40%, and 50%. A semiquantitative method of assessment was used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Values for left ventricular systolic function (22 ), expressed as ejection fraction (EF), were categorized into 4 classes with interclass limits of 30%, 40%, and 50% (23,24 ). Normal systolic function was defined as EF Ն50%.…”
Section: Echocardiographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the limits of agreement versus radionuclide examination are quite wide for these methods [4,5,6,7]. Wall motion score index might be easier to perform in patients with poor image quality, since the segments are evaluated on moving images, but the method is still more time consuming than visual estimation of global ejection fraction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%