The genetically manipulated organism (GMO) crisis demonstrated that technological development based solely on the law of the marketplace and State protection against serious risks to health and safety is no longer a warrant of ethical acceptability. In the first part of our paper, we critique the implicitly individualist social-acceptance model for State regulation of technology and recommend an interdisciplinary approach for comprehensive analysis of the impacts and ethical acceptability of technologies. In the second part, we present a framework for the analysis of impacts and acceptability, devised—with the goal of supporting the development of specific nanotechnological applications—by a team of researchers from various disciplines. At the conceptual level, this analytic framework is intended to make explicit those various operations required in preparing a judgement about the acceptability of technologies that have been implicit in the classical analysis of toxicological risk. On a practical level, we present a reflective tool that makes it possible to take into account all the dimensions involved and understand the reasons invoked in determining impacts, assessing them, and arriving at a judgement about acceptability.
pH was used as the main driving parameter for specifically immobilizing silicon nanowires onto Si3N4 microsquares at the surface of a SiO2 substrate. Different pH values of the coating aqueous solution enabled to experimentally distribute nanowires between silicon nitride and silicon dioxide: at pH 3 nanowires were mainly anchored on Si3N4; they were evenly distributed between SiO2 and Si3N4 at pH 2.8; and they were mainly anchored on SiO2 at pH 2. A theoretical model based on DLVO theory and surface protonation/deprotonation equilibria was used to study how, in adequate pH conditions, Si nanowires could be anchored onto specific regions of a patterned Si3N4/SiO2 surface. Instead of using capillary forces, or hydrophilic/hydrophobic contrast between the two types of materials, the specificity of immobilization could rely on surface electric charge contrasts between Si3N4 and SiO2. This simple and generic method could be used for addressing a large diversity of nano-objects onto patterned substrates.
Radiation from a 193 nm ArF laser was investigated to modify surface properties of InGaAs/InGaAsP quantum well (QW) heterostructures and introduce defects required to enhance intermixing during the annealing process. A top 200 nm thick sacrificial layer of InP served as a reservoir for laser generated defects. The irradiation with up to 90 pulses at 65–150 mJ/cm2 allowed to generate an array of 1.2×1 mm2 sites of QW intermixed material, with bandgap energy blueshifted up to 107 nm. We discuss the mechanism and advantages of this approach for postgrowth wafer level fabrication of multibandgap QW material.
Maskless selective area cw Nd:YAG laser annealing of GaInAsP/InP quantum well (QW) structures has been investigated as a possible route towards the fabrication of monolithically integrated photonic circuits. Laser irradiation of a 5 QW laser structure, originally designed for lasers emitting at 1.52 μm, yielded material having a continuously changing band gap ranging from 1.52 to 1.4 μm over the distance of about 3 mm. Bars with arrays of ridge waveguide lasers, having cavity lengths from 300 to 600 μm, were fabricated from the processed material. An individual bar, 2–3 mm long, comprised lasers operating typically between 1.4 and 1.52 μm. The lasers showed stable threshold current density and high quantum efficiency at all operating wavelengths. The results indicate that the applied approach has the potential to realize the cost-effective fabrication of advanced photonic devices and photonic integrated circuits.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.