Objectives: To evaluate the effect of a traditional "center-center" end point for distal tibia nailing in comparison with a lateral-of-center end point on fracture malalignment in a cadaver model. Methods:Nine matched pairs of human cadaveric lower-extremity specimens were used to model the effect of nail end point on fracture alignment in extra-articular distal tibia fractures. After simulation of the fracture through a standardized osteotomy, 1 member of each pair was fixed with an intramedullary nail using a "center-center" end point, whereas a lateral-of-center end point was used for the other member of the pair. Specimens were stripped of soft tissue, and digital calipers were used to measure fracture translation and gap medially, laterally, anteriorly, and posteriorly. Coronal plane angulation at each fracture was measured on the final mortise image. Results:The average coronal angulation was 7.0 degrees of valgus (with a SD of 4.1) in central-end point specimens versus 0.2 degrees of valgus (SD = 1.5) in lateral-end point specimens (P , 0.001). Lateralend point specimens also demonstrated significantly less fracture gap medially (mean 0.2 vs. 3.1 mm for central-end point specimens, P , 0.001), anteriorly (mean 0.1 vs. 1.3 mm, P = 0.003), and posteriorly (mean 0.3 vs. 2.2 mm, P = 0.003). Lateral-end point specimens also showed less lateral translation (mean 0.6 vs. 1.6 mm, P = 0.006).Conclusions: Lateral-of-center nail end points may help surgeons restore native alignment in extra-articular distal tibia fractures and avoid valgus malalignment.

Background: There is evidence that interfragmentary fracture gap size may affect the compression achievable with a modern headless compression screw (HCS). This mechanical study compared the compression achieved by 3 commercial HCS systems through various fracture gaps: CAPTIVATE Headless (Globus Medical, Inc, Audubon, Pennsylvania), Synthes (DePuy Synthes, Westchester, Pennsylvania), and Acumed Acutrak 2 (Acumed LLC, Hillsboro, Oregon). Methods: Screws were inserted into a custom test fixture composed of polyurethane synthetic bone foam fragments, separated by a layer of easily compressible polyurethane foam simulating a fracture gap. Compression was measured after final insertion and countersinking. The effect of the interfragmentary fracture gap size on the compression generated was also investigated. Results: The CAPTIVATE Headless 3.0 mm screw (70.1 ± 5.7 N) and the Synthes 3.0 mm screw (64.9 ± 7.3 N) achieved similar compressive forces after final countersink. Similar comparisons were found for the CAPTIVATE Headless 2.5 mm and Synthes 2.4 mm screws, and the CAPTIVATE Headless 4.0 mm and Acutrak 2 Standard screws. The final compression of the CAPTIVATE Headless 2.5 mm and Synthes 2.4 mm screws was not significantly affected when the fracture gap was doubled from 2 to 4 mm, but was reduced significantly by 95.9% with the Acutrak 2 Micro screw. Conclusion: When comparing like-sized screws, the CAPTIVATE, Synthes, and Acutrak 2 HCS systems demonstrated similar potential compressive forces. However, compared with the CAPTIVATE Headless and Synthes HCS systems, which are inserted with a compression sleeve that is not gap distance–dependent, the Acutrak 2 HCS system demonstrated less compression when the simulated fracture gap size was increased to 4 mm.

No abstract