The controllability study is an integral part of chemical process design. In this work, the controllability of two special distillation techniques, extractive distillation and pressure swing distillation, designed for the separation of azeotropic mixtures is investigated with dynamic tools. The control design interface of Aspen Plus and Matlab are applied for the modeling and evaluation of the two systems. Dynamic controllability indices are determined and aggregated in a desirability function. The results are compared to obtain efficient help for process design activity. The pressure swing distillation shows significantly better controllability features than the extractive distillation. The reason can be the fact that in the case of the extractive distillation, a third compound, the extractive agent, is added to the system to carry out the separation, therefore making the system more complex. As far as the selection of manipulated variables is concerned, in the case of the extractive distillation, the reflux flows should be preferred to the reflux ratios but in the case of the pressure swing distillation, the reboiler heat loads are preferred to the reflux ratios since those are closer to the controlled compositions. Both separation systems show worse controllability features if the product purity requirement is approaching to the pure products, that is, close to 100%. Although the energy consumption of the pressure swing distillation is higher than that of the extractive distillation, it has the inherent feature that it can be automatically heat integrated due to a column operated at high pressure and, as a consequence, higher temperatures.

The aim of process integration is the efficient use of energy and natural resources. However, process integration can result in a more precise process operation, that is, it influences controllability. Pressure-swing distillation processes are designed for the separation of azeotropic mixtures, but their inherent heat integration option can be utilized to significantly reduce their energy consumption. One maximum-boiling and three minimum-boiling azeotropes are considered to study and compare the nonintegrated and integrated alternatives with the tool of mathematical modeling where ASPEN Plus and MATLAB software are used. The results show that the heat-integrated alternatives result in 32–45% energy savings that are proportional to the emission reduction and the consumption of natural resources. As far as the operability is concerned, the heat-integrated alternatives show worse controllability features than the nonintegrated base case. This can be due to the loss of one controllability degree of freedom. This recommends using more sophisticated control structures for the sake of safe operation if process integration is applied.

Controllability features of the extractive distillation process and the pressureswing distillation process were studied with dynamic tools and compared in the case study of separation of a mixture of 50 mol % tetrahydrofuran and 50 mol % water. Process simulations with Aspen Plus and Aspen Plus Dynamics were carried out to obtain 99.9 mol % product purity. Control structures for the two distillation techniques were determined. Load rejection studies were completed for ±10 % feed throughput and ±10 % feed composition disturbances, for both processes. The comparison of the dynamic responses, integral absolute errors, and integral square errors shows that the pressure-swing distillation process has better controllability features than extractive distillation.