Objective
To examine the proportion of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) patients receiving pharmacologic DPN treatments and specifically to identify the rates and factors associated with opioid use and first line opioid use.
Methods
A 10% sample of IMS-LifeLink claims data from 1998 through 2008 was used. The study population consisted of diabetic patients who met DPN criteria using a validated DPN algorithm. Multivariable logistic regression controlling for demographics, comorbidities, and other clinical characteristics was used to identify factors associated with any DPN pharmacologic treatment, any opioid use, and first-line opioid treatment. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore variations in exclusion criteria as well as opioid use definitions.
Results
666 DPN patients met inclusion criteria and pharmacologic treatment was received by 288 subjects (43.24%) and of those, 154 (53.47%) had DPN related opioid use and 96 (33.33%) received opioid as first line treatment. Persons with diabetic complications were more likely to use opioids (OR=4.53, 95% CI=1.09-18.92). FDA approved DPN agents duloxetine 1.04% (n=3) and pregabalin 5.56% (n=16) had much lower rates of use. DPN related drug use and DPN related opioid usage increased as we used less restrictive samples in sensitivity analyses.
Conclusion
Opioids were the most frequently prescribed first line agents for DPN. More than 50 % of DPN patients remained untreated with pharmacologic agents one year after a DPN diagnosis.
Management of acute illness has been increasingly shifted to community practitioners. Expansion of community pharmacy into home healthcare has brought new opportunities and responsibilities to community practitioners. These practitioners are gaining expertise in total parenteral nutrition, intravenous infusion systems, intravenous catheters, parenteral antibiotics, and clinical pharmacokinetics--areas historically managed by hospital and long-term care facility pharmacists. This shift to community pharmacy-based care has brought with it the need for community pharmacists to develop expertise in therapeutic monitoring of chronic disease states. Dose adjustment of medications based upon careful analysis of blood concentrations is no longer limited to institutional pharmacy practice. Community pharmacists now must master basic infectious disease principles and possess internal medicine knowledge to ensure appropriate monitoring of their patients. This article discusses several disease states currently managed with community pharmacy-based home healthcare, summarizing basic monitoring parameters for comprehensive patient care, and provides sample supply lists and documentation forms for home healthcare providers.
Hospital Pharmacy welcomes contributions to this column. Articles originally published in pharmacy department newsletters are reprinted here. Material is selected because of its educational value to pharmacists or because it demonstrates the type of information of interest to newsletter readers. If you wish to have your newsletter material considered for publication in this column, mail a copy—along with a computer disk containing the document—to Neil M. Davis, Editor-in-Chief, Hospital Pharmacy, 1143 Wright Drive, Huntingdon Valley, PA 19006-2721.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.