Metabolic organs such as the liver and adipose tissue produce several peptide hormones that influence metabolic homeostasis. Fat bodies, the Drosophila counterpart of liver and adipose tissues, have been thought to analogously secrete several hormones that affect organismal physiology, but their identity and regulation remain poorly understood. Previous studies have indicated that microRNA miR-8, functions in the fat body to non-autonomously regulate organismal growth, suggesting that fat body-derived humoral factors are regulated by miR-8. Here, we found that several putative peptide hormones known to have mitogenic effects are regulated by miR-8 in the fat body. Most members of the imaginal disc growth factors and two members of the adenosine deaminase-related growth factors are up-regulated in the absence of miR-8. Drosophila insulin-like peptide 6 (Dilp6) and imaginal morphogenesis protein-late 2 (Imp-L2), a binding partner of Dilp, are also up-regulated in the fat body of miR-8 null mutant larvae. The fat body-specific reintroduction of miR-8 into the miR-8 null mutants revealed six peptides that showed fat-body organ-autonomous regulation by miR-8. Amongst them, only Imp-L2 was found to be regulated by U-shaped, the miR-8 target for body growth. However, a rescue experiment by knockdown of Imp-L2 indicated that Imp-L2 alone does not account for miR-8's control over the insect's growth. Our findings suggest that multiple peptide hormones regulated by miR-8 in the fat body may collectively contribute to Drosophila growth.

Torso is a receptor tyrosine kinase whose localized activation at the termini of the Drosophila embryo is mediated by its ligand, Trunk. Recent studies have unveiled a second function of Torso in the larval prothoracic gland (PG) as the receptor for the prothoracicotropic hormone, which triggers pupariation. As such, inhibition of Torso in the PG prolongs the larval growth period, thereby increasing the final pupa size. Here, we report that Torso also acts in the larval fat body, regulating body size in a manner opposite from that of Torso in PG. We confirmed the expression of torso mRNA in the larval fat body and its reduction by RNA interference (RNAi). Fat body-specific knockdown of torso, by either of the two independent RNAi transgenes, significantly decreased the final pupal size. We found that torso knockdown suppresses insulin/target of rapamycin (TOR) signaling in the fat body, as confirmed by repression of Akt and S6K. Notably, the decrease in insulin/TOR signaling and decrease of pupal size induced by the knockdown of torso were rescued by the expression of a constitutively active form of the insulin receptor or by the knockdown of FOXO. Our study revealed a novel role for Torso in the fat body with respect to regulation of insulin/TOR signaling and body size. This finding exemplifies the contrasting effects of the same gene expressed in two different organs on organismal physiology.

RNase E has a pivotal role in the degradation and processing of RNAs in Escherichia coli, and protein inhibitors RraA and RraB control its enzymatic activity. The halophilic patho-genic bacterium Vibrio vulnificus also expresses orthologs of RNase E and RraA-RNase EV, RraAV1, and RraAV2 (herein renamed as VvRNase E, VvRraA1, and VvRraA2). A previous study showed that VvRraA1 actively inhibits the ribonucleolytic activity of VvRNase E by interacting with the C-terminal region of VvRNase E. However, the molecular mechanism underlying the effect of VvRraA1 on the ribonucleolytic activity of VvRNase E has not yet been elucidated. In this study, we report that the oligomer formation of VvRraA proteins affects binding efficiency to VvRNase E as well as inhibitory activity on VvRNase E action. The hexameric structure of VvRraA1 was converted to lower oligomeric forms when the Cys 9 residue was substituted with an Asp residue (VvRraA1-C9D), showing decreased inhibi-tory activity of VvRraA1 on VvRNase E in vivo. These results indicated that the intermolecu-lar disulfide linkage contributed critically to the hexamerization of VvRraA1 for its proper function. On the contrary, the VvRraA2 that existed in a trimeric state did not bind to or inhibit VvRNase E. An in vitro cleavage assay further showed the reduced inhibitory effect of VvRraA-C9D on VvRNase E activity compared to wild-type VvRraA1. These findings provide insight into how VvRraA proteins can regulate VvRNase E action on its substrate RNA in V. vulnificus. In addition, based on structural and functional comparison of RraA homo-logs, we suggest that hexameric assembly of RraA homologs may well be required for their action on RNase E-like proteins.