The capability of forest stands to intercept snow is an important factor in determining management prescriptions for such hydrologically related phenomenon as avalanches, floods, and water supply as well as suitability for ungulate winter habitat. This study tested the hypothesis that snow interception can be predicted as a function of various stand characteristics and storm sizes. The dependent variable was fresh snow depth under the forest canopy; the independent variables were crown completeness, crown length, crown width, basal area per hectare, tree height, tree density, and storm size. Ten stands were selected for study from two locations on Vancouver Island. Snow depth was monitored over 24 storms ranging from 1.4 to 38.0 cm. The best simple linear regression models that incorporated forest variables were those for individual storms, with fresh snow expressed as a function of mean crown completeness. The best assessments of a particular stand's capability to intercept snow were made using an equation with both storm size and mean crown completeness as independent variables.

No abstract

Citizens’ trust of authorities is of general importance, as it can affect trust in society as a whole. The Swedish Transport Agency is a state administrative authority responsible for driving license withdrawal. If withdrawals are experienced as unfair by those affected, this might lead to decreased trust in the agency and in other actors involved. This study accordingly examines how the experiences of people who have had their driving license for a private car withdrawn due to visual field loss might affect their distrust of the authorities, as related to outcomes and processes. Follow-up interviews were conducted with nine people from a previous study. Content analysis revealed one overarching theme, struggling for justice within a system perceived as unfair, which comprised four identified categories: preparedness for and understanding of the withdrawn driving license (WDL); perceptions of assessment methods, reactions and actions regarding the decision, and perceptions of the authorities’ performance. In sum, the vision tests on which withdrawals are based were perceived as unfair, as they did not measure individual driving ability. Furthermore, rejections of appeals led to feelings of hopelessness. Distrust regarding outcomes and processes related to the withdrawals was also fueled by experiences of deficiencies regarding, for example, performance and information.