Background. DNA of African swine fever virus (ASFV) has previously been detected in hematophagous insects on ASF outbreak farms. However, it remains unclear whether the viral DNA derived from blood meals that originated from pigs on the outbreak farm or was introduced from infected domestic pigs or wild boar sources located outside of the outbreak farm. Methods. We caught 644 hematophagous insects on the windows at two non-outbreak high-biosecurity pig farms (i.e., without ASFV-infected pigs) using plastic meshes coated with sticky glue, as well as 3576 hematophagous insects using H-traps on or around the farms. Using PCR analyses, we identified which insects were present, whether these hematophagous insects carried blood from an external (exogenous) source and if the blood contained ASFV DNA. Results. We found blood meals with ASFV DNA in one pool of five Haematopota spp. in the H-traps. From the window traps, we found 0–2.7% of Haematopota spp., Stomoxys calcitrans, and Aedes spp. carrying blood meals from exogenous sources into the farms. Some insects carried bovine blood; the closest registered source for this was 2500m from the pig farm. Conclusion. Hematophagous insects carrying ASFV-positive blood meals or blood meals from exogenous sources seem to be attracted to high-biosecurity pig farms and attempt to enter them through their windows. Despite the small percentage of insects carrying blood and the small amounts carried by each insect, the large numbers of insects result in a sufficient volume of exogenous blood, potentially containing ASFV, to constitute a non-negligible risk for ASFV-introduction into unprotected pig stables. This study is the first to provide quantitative data on the number of hematophagous insects trying to enter high-biosecurity pig farms. It is also the first to provide information about the origin of their blood meals, indicating that insect-borne introduction of blood containing ASFV into high-biosecurity pig farms is possible and, therefore, could potentially be responsible for some of the outbreaks observed during the summer peaks of infection.

We caught stable- and house flies on a Danish LA-MRSA positive pig farm. Stable- and house flies were housed together and culled over time to test for the presence of live LA-MRSA bacteria at 24 h intervals to establish the length of time for which LA-MRSA can persist on flies. On average, 7% of stable flies and 27% of house flies tested positive for LA-MRSA immediately upon removal from the farm. LA-MRSA prevalence decreased over time and estimates based on a Kaplan–Meier time-to-event analysis indicated that the probability of a stable- or house fly testing positive for LA-MRSA was 5.4% and 7.8% after 24 h, 3.5% and 4.3% after 48 h, 3.1% and 2.2% after 72 h and 0.4% and 0% after 96 h of removal from the pig farm, respectively. Simultaneously, we found that caged cultivated house flies became carriers of LA-MRSA, without direct contact with pigs, in the same proportions as wild flies inside the farm. We provide distance distributions of Danish pig farms and residential addresses as well as the calculated maximum dispersal potentials of stable- and house flies, which suggest that there is a potential for stable- and house flies dispersing live LA-MRSA bacteria into the surrounding environment of a pig farm. This potential should therefore be considered when modelling the spread between farms or the risk posed to humans living in close proximity to LA-MRSA pig farm sources.

IntroductionMosquitoes either biologically or mechanically transmit various vector-borne pathogens affecting pigs. Mosquito species display a wide variety of host preference, as well as host attraction and behaviours. Mosquito species attraction rates to- and feeding rates on pigs or other potential hosts, as well as the seasonal abundance of the mosquito species affects their pathogen transmission potential.MethodsWe caught mosquitoes in experimental cages containing pigs situated in Romanian backyard farms. The host species of blood meals were identified with PCR and sequencing.ResultsHigh feeding preferences for pigs were observed in Aedes vexans (90%), Anopheles maculipennis (80%) and Culiseta annulata (72.7%). However, due to a high abundance in the traps, Culex pipiens/torrentium were responsible for 37.9% of all mosquito bites on pigs in the Romanian backyards, despite low feeding rates on pigs in the cages (18.6%). We also found that other predominantly ornithophilic mosquito species, as well as mosquitoes that are already carrying a blood meal from a different (mammalian) host, were attracted to backyard pigs or their enclosure.DiscussionThese results indicate that viraemic blood carrying, for instance, African swine fever virus, West-Nile virus or Japanese encephalitis virus could be introduced to these backyard pig farms and therefore cause an infection, either through subsequent feeding, via ingestion by the pig or by environmental contamination.

A seasonal trend of African swine fever (ASF) outbreaks in domestic pig farms has been observed in affected regions of Eastern Europe. Most outbreaks have been observed during the warmer summer months, coinciding with the seasonal activity pattern of blood-feeding insects. These insects may offer a route for introduction of the ASF virus (ASFV) into domestic pig herds. In this study, insects (hematophagous flies) collected outside the buildings of a domestic pig farm, without ASFV-infected pigs, were analyzed for the presence of the virus. Using qPCR, ASFV DNA was detected in six insect pools; in four of these pools, DNA from suid blood was also identified. This detection coincided with ASFV being reported in the wild boar population within a 10 km radius of the pig farm. These findings show that blood from ASFV-infected suids was present within hematophagous flies on the premises of a pig farm without infected animals and support the hypothesis that blood-feeding insects can potentially transport the virus from wild boars into domestic pig farms.