Abstract. Cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) are derived from particles emitted directly into the atmosphere (primary emissions) or from the growth of nanometer-sized particles nucleated in the atmosphere. It is important to separate these two sources because they respond in different ways to gas and particle emission control strategies and environmental changes. Here, we use a global aerosol microphysics model to quantify the contribution of primary and nucleated particles to global CCN. The model considers primary emissions of sea spray, sulfate and carbonaceous particles, and nucleation processes appropriate for the free troposphere and boundary layer. We estimate that 45% of global low-level cloud CCN at 0.2% supersaturation are secondary aerosol derived from nucleation (ranging between 31-49% taking into account uncertainties in primary emissions and nucleation rates), with the remainder from primary emissions. The model suggests that 35% of CCN (0.2%) in global low-level clouds were created in the free and upper troposphere. In the marine boundary layer 55% of CCN (0.2%) are from nucleation, with 45% entrained from the free troposphere and 10% nucleated directly in the boundary layer. Combinations of model runs show that primary and nucleated CCN are non-linearly coupled. In particular, boundary layer nucleated CCN are strongly suppressed by both primary emissions and entrainment of particles nucleated in the free troposphere. Elimination of all primary emissions reduces global CCN (0.2%) by only 20% and elimination of upper tropospheric nucleation reduces CCN (0.2%) by only 12% because of the increased contribution from boundary layer nucleation.

Fundamental questions remain about the origin of newly formed atmospheric aerosol particles because data from laboratory measurements have been insufficient to build global models. In contrast, gas-phase chemistry models have been based on laboratory kinetics measurements for decades. We built a global model of aerosol formation by using extensive laboratory measurements of rates of nucleation involving sulfuric acid, ammonia, ions, and organic compounds conducted in the CERN CLOUD (Cosmics Leaving Outdoor Droplets) chamber. The simulations and a comparison with atmospheric observations show that nearly all nucleation throughout the present-day atmosphere involves ammonia or biogenic organic compounds, in addition to sulfuric acid. A considerable fraction of nucleation involves ions, but the relatively weak dependence on ion concentrations indicates that for the processes studied, variations in cosmic ray intensity do not appreciably affect climate through nucleation in the present-day atmosphere. N ucleation of particles occurs throughout Earth's atmosphere by condensation of trace vapors (1-3). Around 40 to 70% of global cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) (4-6) are thought to originate as nucleated particles, so the process has a major influence on the microphysical properties of clouds and the radiative balance of the global climate system. However, laboratory measurements are needed to disentangle and quantify the processes that contribute to particle formation, and very few laboratory measurements exist under atmospheric conditions (7)(8)(9)(10). This leaves open fundamental questions concerning the origin of particles on a global scale. First, it is not known whether nucleation is predominantly a neutral process, as assumed in most models (11-13), or whether atmospheric ions are important (6,(14)(15)(16). This relates to the question of whether solar-modulated galactic cosmic rays (GCRs) affect aerosols, clouds, and climate (17-21). Second, the lack of measurements of nucleation rates at low temperatures means that the origin of new particles in the vast regions of the cold free troposphere has not yet been experimentally established. Third, whereas it has been shown that nucleation of sulfuric acid (H 2 SO 4 )-water particles in the boundary layer requires stabilizing molecules such as ammonia (NH 3 ), amines, or oxidized organic compounds (7,8,(22)(23)(24), it is not yet known from existing experimental data over how much of the troposphere these molecules are important for nucleation. Robust atmospheric models to answer these questions need to be founded on direct measurements of nucleation rates. At present, to simulate nucleation over a very wide range of atmospheric conditions, global models must use theoretical nucleation models (25, 26), which can require adjustments to the nucleation rates of several orders of magnitude to obtain reasonable agreement with ambient observations (27,28).The lack of an experimentally based model of global particle nucleation is in stark contrast to global models of atmos...

[1] We use a global aerosol microphysics model to predict the contribution of boundary layer (BL) particle formation to regional and global distributions of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN). Including an observationally derived particle formation scheme, where the formation rate of molecular clusters is proportional to gas-phase sulfuric acid to the power one, improves modeled particle size distribution and total particle number concentration at three continental sites in Europe. Particle formation increases springtime BL global mean CCN (0.2% supersaturation) concentrations by 3 -20% and CCN (1%) by 5 -50%. Uncertainties in particle formation and growth rates must be reduced before the accuracy of these predictions can be improved. These results demonstrate the potential importance of BL particle formation as a global source of CCN.

Abstract. We synthesised observations of total particle number (CN) concentration from 36 sites around the world. We found that annual mean CN concentrations are typically 300-2000 cm −3 in the marine boundary layer and free troposphere (FT) and 1000-10 000 cm −3 in the continental boundary layer (BL). Many sites exhibit pronounced seasonality with summer time concentrations a factor of 2-10 greater than wintertime concentrations. We used these CN obserCorrespondence to: D. V. Spracklen (dominick@env.leeds.ac.uk) vations to evaluate primary and secondary sources of particle number in a global aerosol microphysics model. We found that emissions of primary particles can reasonably reproduce the spatial pattern of observed CN concentration (R 2 =0.46) but fail to explain the observed seasonal cycle (R 2 =0.1). The modeled CN concentration in the FT was biased low (normalised mean bias, NMB=−88%) unless a secondary source of particles was included, for example from binary homogeneous nucleation of sulfuric acid and water (NMB=−25%). Simulated CN concentrations in the continental BL were also biased low (NMB=−74%) unless the number emission of anthropogenic primary particles was increased or a Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. 4776 D. V. Spracklen et al.: Explaining global aerosol number concentrations mechanism that results in particle formation in the BL was included. We ran a number of simulations where we included an empirical BL nucleation mechanism either using the activation-type mechanism (nucleation rate, J , proportional to gas-phase sulfuric acid concentration to the power one) or kinetic-type mechanism (J proportional to sulfuric acid to the power two) with a range of nucleation coefficients. We found that the seasonal CN cycle observed at continental BL sites was better simulated by BL particle formation (R 2 =0.3) than by increasing the number emission from primary anthropogenic sources (R 2 =0.18). The nucleation constants that resulted in best overall match between model and observed CN concentrations were consistent with values derived in previous studies from detailed case studies at individual sites. In our model, kinetic and activation-type nucleation parameterizations gave similar agreement with observed monthly mean CN concentrations.