Introduction. Refractory shockable rhythm has a high mortality rate and poor neurological outcome. Treatments for refractory shockable rhythm presenting after defibrillation and medical treatment are not definite. We conducted research on the application of double simultaneous defibrillation (DSiD) for refractory shockable rhythms. Methods. This is a retrospective pilot study performed using medical records from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2017. The prephase was from January to December 2016. The post-phase was from January to December 2017. During the prephase, we conducted conventional defibrillation with one defibrillator, and during the post-phase, we conducted DSiD using two defibrillators. Primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes included survival to hospital admission and good neurological outcome at 12 months. Statistical analysis was conducted using Fisher’s exact test. Data were regarded statistically significant when p<0.05. Result. A total of 38 patients were included. Twenty-one patients underwent conventional defibrillation, and 17 underwent DSiD. The DSiD group had a higher survival to admission rate (14/17 (82.4%) vs. 6/21 (28.6%), p=0.001) and showed a trend for higher survival to discharge (7/17 (41.2%) vs. 3/21 (14.3%), p=0.078). Good neurological outcome at 12 months of the DSiD group was higher than that of the conventional defibrillation group, but the difference was not statistically significant (5/17 (29.4%) vs 2/21 (9.5%), p=0.207). Conclusion. In patients with refractory shockable rhythms, DSiD has increased survival to hospital admission and a trend of increased survival to hospital discharge. However, DSiD did not improve neurological outcome at 12 months.

We performed a large, population-based study to analyze the risk factors of the febrile seizures and the subsequent afebrile epileptic seizures. Methods: Relevant data from children born between 2002-2007 were retrieved from the Korean National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort 2002-2013. Children who did not survive the first five years were excluded from the analysis. The risk factors for febrile seizures were assessed separately in per-person and perfebrile case analyses, and factors contributing to an increased risk of subsequent afebrile epileptic seizures were identified. Results: A total of 54,233 children were included and the five-year prevalence rate of febrile seizure was 11.19%. In the per-person analysis, male sex, preterm birth and brain injury at birth increased the risk of febrile seizure with odds ratios of 1.17, 1.40 and 1.97 (all p < 0.001), respectively. A high household income level was associated with reduced odds of febrile seizure. In the per-febrile illness analysis, male sex, brain injury at birth, presumed bacterial infection, gastrointestinal or genitourinary infection and unspecified sepsis were independent risk factors of a febrile seizure during febrile illness. The cumulative number of febrile seizure episodes, especially more than the third episodes, was associated with a new diagnosis of an afebrile epileptic seizure within one year. Conclusion: Sex, preterm birth, brain injury at birth, presumed bacterial infection, genitourinary and gastrointestinal infections and unspecified sepsis were identified as likely risk factors for febrile seizures. A greater number of febrile seizure episodes was associated with a higher probability of subsequent afebrile epileptic seizures.