ObjectivesMechanical loading may be an important factor in the regulation of bone derived hormones involved in phosphate homeostasis. This study investigated the effects of peak power and endurance training on expression levels of fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) and 1α-hydroxylase (CYP27b1) in bone.MethodsThirty-eight rats were assigned to six weeks of training in four groups: peak power (PT), endurance (ET), PT followed by ET (PET) or no training (control). In cortical bone, FGF23 was quantified using immunohistochemistry. mRNA expression levels of proteins involved in phosphate and vitamin D homeostasis were quantified in cortical bone and kidney. C-terminal FGF23, 25-hydroxyvitamin D3, parathyroid hormone (PTH), calcium and phosphate concentrations were measured in plasma or serum.ResultsNeither FGF23 mRNA and protein expression levels in cortical bone nor FGF23 plasma concentrations differed between the groups. In cortical bone, mRNA expression levels of sclerostin (SOST), dental matrix protein 1 (DMP1), phosphate-regulating gene with homologies to endopeptidases on the X chromosome (PHEX) and matrix extracellular phosphoglycoprotein (MEPE) were lower after PT compared to ET and PET. Expression levels of CYP27b1 and vitamin D receptor (VDR) in tibial bone were decreased after PT compared to ET. In kidney, no differences between groups were observed for mRNA expression levels of CYP27b1, 24-hydroxylase (CYP24), VDR, NaPi-IIa cotransporter (NPT2a) and NaPi-IIc cotransporter (NPT2c). Serum PTH concentrations were higher after PT compared to controls.ConclusionAfter six weeks, none of the training modalities induced changes in FGF23 expression levels. However, PT might have caused changes in local phosphate regulation within bone compared to ET and PET. CYP27b1 and VDR expression in bone was reduced after PT compared to ET, suggesting high intensity peak power training in this rat model is associated with decreased vitamin D signalling in bone.
Ulcerative colitis (UC) is characterized by chronic inflammation of the colorectum. Histological remission has emerged as a potential future treatment goal; however, the histopathological assessment of intestinal inflammation in UC remains challenging with a multitude of available scoring systems and the need for a pathologist with expertise in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In previous studies, quantitative phase imaging (QPI) including digital holographic microscopy (DHM) was successfully applied as an objective method for stain-free quantification of the degree of inflammation in tissue sections. Here, we evaluated the application of DHM for the quantitative assessment of histopathological inflammation in patients with UC. In our study, endoscopically obtained colonic and rectal mucosal biopsy samples from 21 patients with UC were analyzed by capturing DHM-based QPI images that were subsequently evaluated using the subepithelial refractive index (RI). The retrieved RI data were correlated with established histological scoring systems including the Nancy index (NI) as well as with endoscopic and clinical findings. As a primary endpoint, we found a significant correlation between the DHM-based retrieved RI and the NI (R2 = 0.251, p < 0.001). Furthermore, RI values correlated with the Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES; R2 = 0.176, p < 0.001). An area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve of 0.820 confirms the subepithelial RI as a reliable parameter to distinguish biopsies with histologically active UC from biopsies without evidence of active disease as determined by conventional histopathological examination. An RI higher than 1.3488 was found to be the most sensitive and specific cut-off value to identify histologically active UC (sensitivity of 84% and specificity of 72%). In conclusion, our data demonstrate DHM to be a reliable tool for the quantitative assessment of mucosal inflammation in patients with UC.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.