Although cause and effect cannot be established, the advent of federally approved drugs for FMS in concert with pharmaceutical industry marketing of these drugs coincide with the observed changes in prevalence, health care utilization, and costs of FMS relative to IBS and CFS.

This study compared TRICARE, the health care program of the United States Department of Defense Military Health System, beneficiaries in CenteringPregnancy, an enhanced prenatal care model, to women in individual prenatal care within the same military treatment facility. Maternity patient experience ratings from May 2014 to February 2016 were compiled from the TRICARE Outpatient Satisfaction Survey. Centering patients had 1.91 higher odds of being satisfied with access to care ( p < .01, 95% CI = 1.2-3.1) than women in individual care. Specifically, the saw provider within 15 minutes of appointment measure found Centering patients to have 2.00 higher odds of being satisfied than women in individual care ( p < .01, 95% CI = 1.2-3.3). There were no other statistically significant differences between cohorts. Qualitative responses indicate most Centering patients surveyed had good experiences, appreciated the structure and communication with others, and would recommend the program. Providers identified command/leadership support, dedicated space, and buy-in from all staff as important factors for successful implementation. Enhanced prenatal care models may improve access to and experiences with care. Program evaluation will be important as the military health system continues to implement such programs.

SUMMARY Goal: We examined the relationship of nine hospital environment measures (room cleanliness, room quietness, food temperature, food variety, mattress comfort, room temperature, room privacy, hospital signage, adequate parking) to two patient outcome measures (likelihood of recommending hospital, overall satisfaction with hospital) by type of services received (medical, obstetric, surgical) at all military medical treatment facilities globally. Our aim was to understand the impact of various hospital environment measures on the patient experience. Methods: We analyzed six logistic regression models, one for each patient satisfaction measure and each service line (medical, obstetric, surgical). The patient characteristic variables were gender, patient age group, and beneficiary category (active duty, active duty family member, retiree, retiree dependents). Results are based on 20,534 completed surveys representing inpatient care delivered October 2019 to March 2020. Data are from the Military Health System TRICARE Inpatient Satisfaction Survey, which is based on the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey with additional Department of Defense questions. Principal Findings: Across all models, nearly all hospital environment measures were found to be significantly related to patient satisfaction outcomes, aside from food variety in two models and room privacy and temperature in one model. The strongest environment impact factor was room cleanliness for both outcomes with odds ratios ranging from 2.1 to 2.7, p < .01 in all cases. The order of impact for the other eight environment factors varied across service lines with some playing dominant roles dependent on the type of care being received. Significant odds ratios (p < .05) ranged from 1.3 to 2.0 for room quietness, 1.5 to 1.9 for hospital signage, 1.3 to 1.5 for both food variety and food temperature, 1.3 to 1.8 for mattress comfort, 1.3 to 1.6 for room temperature, and 1.3 to 1.8 for adequate parking. Hospital environment measures represented a breadth of the patient experience and were significantly related to a patient’s overall satisfaction and likelihood to recommend military inpatient facilities. Applications to Practice: Healthcare leaders continuously focus on improving the overall patient experience. Fostering a positive experience includes many factors such as provider and nurse interactions and communications with patients. Moreover, the hospital environment should not be overlooked as also having an impact on patient satisfaction, and hospital leaders—both military and civilian—should continue to emphasize hospital amenities as well.

No abstract

No abstract