Purpose: To determine the reliability and validity of a novel trunk maximal isometric force assessment involving 7 different tasks with 200-m times for elite sprint flat-water kayakers. Methods: Ten elite sprint flat-water kayakers performed a series of maximal isometric voluntary contractions (MVCs) on 2 separate days to assess reliability. MVC force was assessed as the participants sat on a modified kayak ergometer and applied their maximal isometric force to a uniaxial load cell during 7 different tasks. The 7 tasks of interest were a seated trunk-forward flexion, bilateral (left and right) rotational pulls, bilateral rotational pushes, and a sport-specific bilateral kayak-stroke simulation. Twenty elite flat-water kayak athletes (10 male and 10 female) participated in the validity portion by completing the series of tasks in conjunction with a 200-m race. Results: MVC force values ranged from 84 to 800 N across all participants and all tasks. The average coefficient of variation of the 7 tasks ranged from 2.4% to 7.7%. Regression analysis showed Pearson correlations ranging from −.84 to −.22 for both absolute and relative values with 200-m performance times. Conclusions: MVC force measured in each task was considered reliable as a small degree of variance between trials was found. The summation of the 7 trunk scores showed very strong correlations with on-water performance, indicating that this assessment is valid for elite sprint kayakers.

No abstract

The aim of the study was to assess the validity and reliability of using the Portapres® to measure toe blood pressure during rest and exercise. Construct validity, concurrent validity, and interday reliability were assessed by measuring toe (Portapres®)) and brachial blood pressure in 16 nondisabled participants on consecutive days. Construct validity was assessed by pedaling on a cycle ergometer (6 revolutions per minute) and comparing the measured toe blood pressure to an estimated value based on orthostatic factors. Concurrent validity was assessed by comparing toe and brachial blood pressure during supine rest and following 10 min of cycling exercise. Interday reliability was assessed by recording toe and brachial blood pressure during supine rest on a second day. Construct validity analysis shows that the toe blood pressure signal was moderately correlated with the changes in heart–toe distance and that changes in toe blood pressure during slow cycling were similar to the estimated value. Resting toe and brachial mean arterial blood pressure showed concurrent validity with only a fixed bias explained by the change in orthostatic pressure and the toe–brachial index. Furthermore, cycling exercise was associated with an increase in brachial and a decrease in toe mean blood pressure. The interday reliability analysis showed no proportional or fixed bias for mean arterial blood pressure. Our study showed the feasibility of using the Portapres® to measure toe blood pressure during movement and can be used to study the effect of movement‐related forces during cycling on toe blood pressure.

No abstract

No abstract