CD70 is upregulated in several malignancies, where it induces cytotoxic effects on B and T lymphocytes leading to immune escape. Novel therapeutic agents targeting CD70 have entered clinical trials. We characterized expression of CD70 protein in RCC specimens of various histologic subtypes and assessed their prognostic value and association with clinical/pathological variables. We employed tissue microarrays containing 330 cases using a novel fluorescent immunohistochemistry-based method of Automated Quantitative Analysis (AQUA) of in situ protein expression. The mean expression of CD70 was almost twice as high in tumors relative to normal tissue (p<0.0001). When broken into subsets, CD70 was higher in sarcomatoid and clear cell tumors (p<0.0001), and variably elevated in oncocytomas and some papillary tumors. No association was found between CD70 expression and stage or grade. High CD70 expression was associated with decreased survival on univariate analysis in the clear cell subset of RCC, however, it did not retain significance on multi-variable analysis. Given the elevated expression of CD70 in clear cell, sarcomatoid, and some papillary tumors, our findings suggest that CD70 might be a good drug target in RCC. Additional studies are warranted to assess the association between expression of CD70 and response to therapy with CD70 targeting drugs in RCC.

PurposeAnti-angiogenic therapies are among the most commonly used drugs in renal cell carcinoma. Tumor vascularity, defined by microvessel area, may be associated with response to these drugs. Clinical studies suggest that metastatic sites are more responsive than primary tumors. Our purpose was to characterize microvessel area (MVA) in matched primary and metastatic samples and in samples of different histologies.MethodsWe employed a method of automated, quantitative analysis of in situ tumor components to identify the area of CD-34 staining endothelial cells within renal cell carcinoma tumors. MVA was assessed in corresponding primary and metastatic samples from 34 patients, as well as in 334 primary nephrectomy specimens with variable histologies.ResultsMVA measurements from different parts of the same tumor correlated well (R = 0.75), indicating that MVA was fairly uniform within a tumor. While MVA was slightly higher in primary tumors than corresponding metastatic sites, the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.1). MVA in paired primary and metastatic samples correlated moderately well (R = 0.36). MVA was higher in clear cell than papillary histology and oncocytomas (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.018, respectively).ConclusionsLack of significant differences MVA in matched primary and metastatic samples suggests that both types of tumors should respond to anti-angiogenic drugs. This should be confirmed on additional cohorts. Given the small cohort, future predictive biomarker studies entailing MVA measurements should include specimens from both sites. Clear cell carcinomas are more vascular than other histologic subtypes, which may explain the higher response rates to anti-angiogenic therapies in clear cell tumors.

BackgroundTargeted therapies in renal cell carcinoma can have different effects on primary and metastatic tumors. To pave the way for predictive biomarker development, we assessed differences in expression of targets of currently approved drugs in matched primary and metastatic specimens from 34 patients.MethodsFour cores from each site were embedded in tissue microarray blocks. Expression of B-Raf, C-Raf, cKIT, FGF-R1, HIF-2α, mTOR, PDGF-Rβ, VEGF-R1, VEGF-R2, VEGF-R3, VEGF, VEGF-B, VEGF-C, VEGF-D, MEK1, and ERK1/2 was studied using a quantitative immunofluorescence method.ResultsNo significant differences were observed in global expression levels in primary and metastatic renal cell carcinoma tumors, with the exception of MEK, which had higher expression in metastatic than primary specimens. Similarly, more ki67 positive cells were seen in metastatic specimens. Correlations between marker expression in primary and metastatic specimens were variable, with the lowest correlation seen for FGF-R1 and VEGF-D. There were no significant differences in the degree of heterogeneity in primary versus metastatic tumors.ConclusionsExpression of most of the studied markers was similar in primary and metastatic renal cell carcinoma tumors, suggesting that predictive biomarker testing for these markers can be conducted on either the primary or metastatic tumors for most markers.

No abstract