Water, sanitation, and hygiene (WaSH) are foundational public health interventions for infectious disease control. Renewed efforts to end open defecation and provide universal access to safe drinking water, sanitation, and hygiene by 2030 are being enacted through the Sustainable Development Goals. However, results from clinical trials 1-3 question the efficacy of conventional rural WaSH approaches in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). Randomised trials in Bangladesh, 1 Kenya, 2 and Zimbabwe, 3 which introduced household pit latrines, hand-washing with soap, and point-of-use water chlorination, found no effect on child growth, and two of the three trials found no reductions in diarrhoea in children. We have, therefore, called for transformative WaSH approaches, 4 to more effectively reduce pathogen burden and promote child health and growth in LMICs. However, currently, it remains uncertain what transformative WaSH entails. We hypothesise that exposure to animal faeces is currently an under-recognised threat to human health. Estimates published in 2018 have highlighted the scale of animal faecal hazards, 5 which are not explicitly addressed by conventional WaSH strategies. Globally, 80% of the faecal load is estimated to come from livestock animals, including two-thirds of faeces at the household level. 5 Research addressing the effect of domestic and wild animal faeces on WaSH effectiveness is scarce 6,7 and collaboration between the WaSH, public health, and animal health sectors in LMICs insufficient. 6 As an interdisciplinary group of researchers, policy makers, and practitioners in One Health, epidemiology, veterinary medicine, child health, nutrition, microbiology, geography, social science, WaSH, and animal ecology, we met (on May 22-23, 2019) to focus attention on the neglected burden of domestic and wild animal faecal exposure among rural households in LMICs. We contend that without adding safe management of animal faeces to current programmes focused solely on human waste, rural WaSH programmes will insufficiently reduce faecal exposure from all sources to the extent needed to improve child health. To emphasise this, we propose a paradigm shift in WaSH terminology, by upgrading the