This paper presents the results of the content analysis of 139 Web of Science papers focused on collaborative innovation with external stakeholders of public administration, specifically on co-production and co-creation. The analysis included papers published between 2009 and 2018 and was based on a coding scheme consisting of 12 parameters grouped into four groups: paper descriptors, financial support of the research, methodological framework, and co-creation characteristics. The results reveal a considerable increase in researchers’ interest in co-production and co-creation in the context of public administration in the last few years. This is particularly the case in Northern and Western Europe, where Anglo-Saxon and Nordic administrative traditions dominate. Furthermore, the results show that co-creation is most often placed in the contexts of social policy and welfare, as well as health care. Over the selected period, research seldom addressed companies as a target group in the co-creation of public services—in comparison to citizens and internal users. More than three quarters of the papers observed were empirical and less than 20% were quantitative. In general, a lack of conceptual clarity was often identified through the interchangeable usage of the terms co-creation and co-creation and the low level of international comparison—the majority of the papers focused on case descriptions at a national level, even though collaborative innovation is strongly related to administrative traditions dominating in specific regions.

No abstract

Introduction: As an integral part of health care, biomedical laboratories are an important contributor to quality patient care. There are only few studies on technical and economic efficiency in the field of laboratory medicine. Nevertheless, such research is crucial to further optimize public resources. Aim:The aim of our research is to create and verify a model for defining the scale efficiency of medical laboratories at the primary level of health care. Methods: Twenty-one laboratories at the primary level of health care in Slovenia were included in the analysis. The efficiency of medical laboratories was determined using data envelopment analysis. We additionally used hierarchical cluster analysis to determine the homogeneous groups within the analyzed sample of units. Results: We determined the high technical and pure technical efficiency of the analyzed laboratories. The analysis results showed that changes in work processes represent only a minuscule improvement in efficiency, while more can be achieved through a proper scaling of laboratory services. The impact of the operating scale on the efficiency of laboratories is up to twice as high as the process inefficiency. If we take into account the operating modes of laboratories, the optimal scale of services starts at 237,570 automatic tests. Conclusions:We note that increased automation and consolidation of laboratory activities could contribute to a greater efficiency of medical laboratories and consequently reduce public spending.DEA is an appropriate tool for the efficiency analysis of public medical laboratories and of appropriate support for policy creation and evaluation in the field of laboratory medicine.

In this article, we evaluate the online local budget transparency (OLBT) for all Slovenian municipalities and analyse the impact of various factors on the measured transparency. Most of the municipalities comply with existing regulations. The comparison of the mean values of 91 different characteristics shows that municipalities which do not comply with regulation are smaller, with poorer education structure and social position of citizens. Several municipalities are providing budget transparency beyond the legal requirements. They are smaller and less wealthy than other municipalities complying with regulation. We explain both phenomena by agency and legitimacy theory. 1

As a part of the public governance, transparency started to come forward during the New Public Management reforms, mostly for the evaluation of public sector efficiency. This article focuses on online local budget transparency (OLBT) in two neighbouring countries – Croatia and Slovenia. The article is pioneering in a comparative study of the determinants of budget transparency in the Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries, based on a unique database and measure of transparency. The article tests the determinants of OLBT that reflect the accountability of local authorities and a cornerstone for public participation in the budget process. The following methodology was applied: using a data set of 768 Slovenian and Croatian local governments over the 2015–2017 period and testing it against several financial and socio-economic variables, and a random effects panel logistic regression, separately for Croatia, Slovenia, and a pooled sample. The results indicate that greater size of the population, higher administrative capacity and lower unemployment rate in individual local governments significantly contribute to higher levels of OLBT. This study demonstrates the possibility of developing a standardised measure of local budget transparency and using it to investigate the reasons for different levels of transparency in the two – and potentially other – CEE countries. The results of this and similar studies can serve as a basis for establishing cohesive local budget transparency policies for different countries and creating a combination of policy instruments to enhance transparency.