A computational study of an air-air ejector system, utilizing a primary S-bend transition duct, was compared with experimental results. Two primary ducts, differing in offset, consisted of an annular-to-circular-to-oblong transition which incorporated a total area increase of 62.4% with the duct performing 16% diffusion. The ducts were analyzed both alone and in ejector configuration under varying degrees of inlet swirl. The ejector geometry consisted of the duct with a downstream mixing tube. Several mixing tubes, of oblong cross sectional shape, differing in both length and area, were tested in various parametric configurations. Ejector performance was established on the basis of pumping capability, duct back pressure, and outlet effective area. Experimental work commenced on a cold flow test rig, with duct inlet conditions being measured with four 3-hole pitot probes. The duct outlet profiles were measured using a 7-hole probe which traversed the entire exit area. Three conditions of inlet swirl were analyzed: 0°, 20° and 40°. Experimental results showed an increase in pumping performance with increased inlet swirl, mixing tube length, area ratio and standoff. An optimum standoff value of 0.25Dh2 was observed. CFD simulations were based on experimental mass flow inlet conditions utilizing the realizable k-ε turbulence model. CFD results showed that the realizable k-ε turbulence model was quite capable of modeling the complex flow for the associated geometry, and correctly predicted flow features as well as performance trends for all geometrical configurations tested. However, the CFD was unable to properly predict the duct inlet static pressure leading to erroneous back pressure results.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.