No abstract

The movements of transmembrane segments (TMs) 3 and 6 at the cytoplasmic side of the membrane play an important role in the activation of G-protein-coupled receptors. Here we provide evidence for the existence of an ionic lock that constrains the relative mobility of the cytoplasmic ends of TM3 and TM6 in the inactive state of the ␤ 2 -adrenergic receptor. We propose that the highly conserved Arg-131 3.50 at the cytoplasmic end of TM3 interacts both with the adjacent Asp-130 3.49 and with Glu-268 6.30 at the cytoplasmic end of TM6. Such a network of ionic interactions has now been directly supported by the high-resolution structure of the inactive state of rhodopsin. We hypothesized that the network of interactions would serve to constrain the receptor in the inactive state, and the release of this ionic lock could be a key step in receptor activation. To test this hypothesis, we made charge-neutralizing mutations of Glu-268 The majority of hormones and neurotransmitters exerts its cellular effects by activating cell surface receptors belonging to the superfamily of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) 1 (1-3). The ␤ 2 -adrenergic receptor (␤ 2 AR) belongs to the subfamily of rhodopsin-like receptors and has been used as a prototype GPCR in numerous studies (1-3). Low-resolution structures of rhodopsin, resolved by Schertler and co-workers (4, 5), have demonstrated the presence of seven membrane-spanning ␣-helical segments and have provided important insights into the organization of the transmembrane bundle, allowing the development of tertiary structure models of GPCRs (6 -8). Importantly, a high-resolution structure of rhodopsin has now become available (9) making it possible to consider the functional roles of individual side chains from the perspective of an atomic resolution structure of a homologous GPCR.Understanding the function of GPCRs at a molecular level requires an understanding of how agonist binding to the receptor is converted into receptor activation (3). Studies based on EPR spectroscopy, fluorescence spectroscopy, alterations in cysteine accessibility, and engineering of metal-binding sites have altogether pointed to a key role for conformational changes of . The molecular mechanisms that underlie the movements of TM3 and TM6 and govern the transition of the receptor between its inactive and active states have nonetheless remained unclear. It has been suggested that the protonation of the aspartic acid in the highly conserved (D/E)RY motif at the cytoplasmic side of TM3 leads to a release of constraining intramolecular interactions, thereby resulting in the movements of TM3 and TM6 and a conversion of the receptor to the active state (7,14,16). This hypothesis has been supported by the observation that charge-neutralizing mutations of the aspartic acid (or glutamic acid) in TM3 lead to increased agonist-independent activation of a number of GPCRs (7,14,17,18). Moreover, direct evidence has been obtained indicating that the photoactivation of rhodopsin is accompanied by the uptake of a proton b...

The changes that lead to activation of G protein-coupled receptors have not been elucidated at the structural level. In this work we report the crystal structures of both ground state and a photoactivated deprotonated intermediate of bovine rhodopsin at a resolution of 4.15 Å. In the photoactivated state, the Schiff base linking the chromophore and Lys-296 becomes deprotonated, reminiscent of the G protein-activating state, metarhodopsin II. The structures reveal that the changes that accompany photoactivation are smaller than previously predicted for the metarhodopsin II state and include changes on the cytoplasmic surface of rhodopsin that possibly enable the coupling to its cognate G protein, transducin. Furthermore, rhodopsin forms a potentially physiologically relevant dimer interface that involves helices I, II, and 8, and when taken with the prior work that implicates helices IV and V as the physiological dimer interface may account for one of the interfaces of the oligomeric structure of rhodopsin seen in the membrane by atomic force microscopy. The activation and oligomerization models likely extend to the majority of other G protein-coupled receptors.G protein-coupled receptor ͉ G protein-coupled receptor activation ͉ phototransduction ͉ membrane protein structure G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) comprise the largest family of transmembrane receptors in animals, accounting for Ϸ3% of the genome (1). GPCRs are involved in detecting a large variety of chemical and physical signals, and they are the targets of Ϸ50% of current therapeutics. Structural information on GPCRs has been limited because of difficulties with their expression, purification, intrinsic chemical heterogeneity, and instability. These biochemical problems were overcome by using rhodopsin as a model GPCR, as it is highly expressed in a homogeneous form in rod photoreceptors and stabilized in the ground state by its covalently bound chromophore, 11-cis-retinal (2).The first crystal structure of rhodopsin revealed the arrangement of helices, the interhelical connections, the chromophore binding site, the extracellular ''plug,'' interactions involved in ligand binding in other GPCRs, and cytoplasmic helix 8 (3). Further improvements in the rhodopsin crystals yielded higher-resolution diffraction data that provided details about the effects of water molecules located close to the chromophore and more precise descriptions of the cytoplasmic loops. However, the improved crystals did not elucidate the mechanism of activation (4, 5). The arrangement of the seven transmembrane helices of rhodopsin differs from that in the more completely structurally studied bacterial retinoid-binding protein, bacteriorhodopsin (6).Upon absorption of a single photon of light, rhodopsin's chromophore, 11-cis-retinal, isomerizes to form all-trans-retinal, a covalently bound, full agonist. Once all-trans-retinal is formed, the protein portion of rhodopsin progresses through a series of photostates, including bathorhodopsin, lumirhodopsin, and metarhodopsin I (Met...

The availability of a high-resolution structure of rhodopsin now allows us to reconsider research attempts to understand structure-function relationships in other G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). A comparison of the rhodopsin structure with the results of previous sequence analysis and molecular modeling that incorporated experimental results demonstrates a high degree of success for these methods in predicting the helix ends and protein-protein interface of GPCRs. Moreover, the amino acid residues inferred to form the surface of the binding-site crevice based on our application of the substituted-cysteine accessibility method in the dopamine D(2) receptor are in remarkable agreement with the rhodopsin structure, with the notable exception of some residues in the fourth transmembrane segment. Based on our analysis of the data reviewed, we propose that the overall structures of rhodopsin and of amine receptors are very similar, although we also identified localized regions where the structure of these receptors may diverge. We further propose that several of the highly unusual structural features of rhodopsin are also present in amine GPCRs, despite the absence of amino acids that might have thought to have been critical to the adoption of these features. Thus, different amino acids or alternate microdomains can support similar deviations from regular alpha-helical structure, thereby resulting in similar tertiary structure. Such structural mimicry is a mechanism by which a common ancestor could diverge sufficiently to develop the selectivity necessary to interact with diverse signals, while still maintaining a similar overall fold. Through this process, the core function of signaling activation through a conformational change in the transmembrane segments that alters the conformation of the cytoplasmic surface and subsequent interaction with G proteins is presumably shared by the entire Class A family of receptors, despite their selectivity for a diverse group of ligands.

Agonist binding to G protein-coupled receptors is