Objectives-To investigate the feasibility of ultrasound shear wave elastography (SWE) in assessing iliocostalis lumborum muscle changes after osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT).Methods-Using a linear array ultrasound transducer (4-9 MHz), we prospectively measured the shear wave velocity (SWV) of bilateral iliocostalis lumborum muscles in 20 patients with low back somatic dysfunction and in 9 age-matched healthy volunteers. The SWV was measured in muscle relaxation and contraction in all participants and immediately before and after OMT in patients. We developed a muscle SWV rate [SWV contraction -SWV relaxation )/SWV relaxation ] and an SWV improvement index [(SWV pre-OMT -SWV post-OMT )/SWV pre-OMT ] for quantifying muscle contractibility and changes in muscle stiffness after OMT. Statistical analyses included an unpaired t test to analyze the difference in the muscle SWV between muscle relaxation and contraction and between somatic dysfunction and nonsomatic dysfunction in patients and healthy volunteers, a paired t test to examine the difference in the SWV and SWV rate before and after OMT, the intraclass correlation coefficient to test intraobserver and interobserver reliability, and Spearman rank correlation to analyze the correlation of changes in the SWV with manual osteopathic assessments.Results-The mean ages of the patients with low back somatic dysfunction and the healthy volunteers were 28 and 26 years, respectively. The muscle SWV significantly differed between somatic dysfunction and nonsomatic dysfunction in patients and healthy volunteers, between muscle relaxation and contraction, and before and after OMT (P < .001). The SWV improvement index moderately correlated with manual osteopathic assessments (r = 0.68). The interobserver and intraobserver reliability for performing SWE was good (intraclass correlation coefficient, >0.8).Conclusions-Our results suggest that SWE is feasible for quantifying the change in muscle stiffness and contractibility after OMT.

Context Diagnosis of somatic dysfunction is based on subjective palpatory osteopathic assessments. This subjectivity has posed a challenge for researchers in studying osteopathic medicine. The development and use of radiological imaging techniques to objectively confirm or quantify muscle tissue stiffness associated with somatic dysfunction could be of benefit in osteopathic clinical practice, training, and further research. Objectives To investigate the feasibility of ultrasound shear wave elastography (SWE) to quantify muscle tissue stiffness in somatic dysfunction before and after osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT). Methods In this prospective study, we assessed lumbar spine somatic dysfunction in 20 adult patients before and after a single OMT session using standard osteopathic palpatory assessments by osteopathic physician faculty members in the Department of Osteopathic Principle and Practice at Rocky Vista University College of Osteopathic Medicine (Utah campus). Shear wave velocity (SWV, m/s) was measured in lumbar paraspinal muscle tissue using a commercial ultrasonography scanner on all participants immediately before and after OMT. In this study, OMT techniques targeted the iliocostalis lumborum and included the articulatory technique, balanced ligamentous tension, facilitated positional release, high-velocity, low-amplitude technique, muscle energy, myofascial release, and the Still technique at the discretion of the osteopathic physician. The difference in SWV between muscle tissues with and without dysfunction, and differences in SWV of dysfunctional tissue before and after OMT were examined using unpaired and paired t tests, as appropriate. The correlation between SWV measurements and osteopathic assessments was examined by the Spearman rank correlation. Intra- and interobserver reliability was analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficient. Results The difference in SWV between muscle tissues with and without somatic dysfunction was significant before OMT (mean [SD], 1.93 [0.44] vs 1.69 [0.19]; P=.03) and was not significant after OMT (mean [SD], 1.69 [0.19] vs 1.53 [0.31]; P=.05). The difference in SWV in the same tissue with somatic dysfunction before and after OMT was significant (mean [SD], 1.93 [0.44] vs 1.52 [0.3]; P<.001). The SWV value highly correlated with manual osteopathic assessments (r=0.72). Intra- and interobserver reliability for performing SWE in somatic dysfunction was good (intraclass correlation coefficient >0.80). Conclusions The results of this study show that ultrasound SWE can objectively assess muscle tissue stiffness for diagnosis of somatic dysfunctions and for muscle tissue stiffness changes after OMT.