Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is a useful tool in the diagnosis of pulmonary infections in immunocompromised patients. We aimed to compare the spectrum of infectious pulmonary complications diagnosed using BAL in a large consecutive cohort of immunocompromised patients. The diagnostic yield of 1066 BAL specimens was analyzed in 4 different groups of immunocompromised patients (HIV; solid organ transplants; high-dose chemotherapy and/or stem cell transplants; other immunosuppressive therapy) suffering from fever, respiratory symptoms and/or infiltrates on chest X-ray. Specimens were analyzed for bacteria, mycobacteria, fungi, Pneumocystis jiroveci, cytomegalovirus (CMV) and other viruses. Two time periods were compared (1992-1996; 1997-2003). The overall diagnostic yield of BAL was 34% for bacteria, 22% for CMV, 15% for P. jiroveci, 6% for other viruses, 6% for mycobacteria and 2% for aspergillus. There were significant changes in the pattern of opportunistic infections between the 2 time periods. Mycobacterial infections decreased considerably in the HIV group (17.9 vs. 8.5%, P=0.02), while the incidence of P. jiroveci decreased mainly in the transplant group (32.6 vs. 7.9%, P<0.00001). This study demonstrates a changed pattern of pulmonary infections in immunocompromised patients diagnosed by BAL. The overall diagnostic yield of BAL remains high in immunocompromised patients with respiratory symptoms.

Background: There is a paucity of data comparing doses of sedative medication during bronchoscopy in immunosuppressed and non-immunosuppressed patients. Objectives: The aim of this study was to define the sedative medication doses used in specific patient groups during bronchoscopy. Methods: Bronchoscopy was performed under local anesthesia, sedation with intermittent boluses of intravenous midazolam and intravenous hydrocodone 5 mg. Two hundred and thirty-nine consecutive bronchoalveolar lavage procedures were included. Procedures in non-immunosuppressed patients were classified as controls (n = 91). Procedures in immunosuppressed patients who received midazolam consisted of stem cell transplant (34), solid organ transplant (25), chemotherapy (33), HIV with drug abuse (10), HIV (5), prednisone (17) and immunosuppression for other diseases (12). Intravenous propofol was administered during 12 procedures due to inability to achieve optimal sedation with midazolam in a previous bronchoscopy (stem cell transplant recipient 1, lung transplant for cystic fibrosis 5) and during the same bronchoscopy due to inadequate sedation with a high dose of midazolam – renal transplant recipient 1, drug abuse (HIV 1, renal transplant recipient 1), bronchoscopy combined with gastroscopy (2) and a hypoxemic patient (1). The mean dose of propofol administered was 2.8 ± 1.3 mg/kg. Results: Midazolam requirement was significantly higher in patients with stem cell transplantation (0.09 ± 0.05 mg/kg) compared with controls (0.06 ± 0.03 mg/kg; p = 0.0002). In the HIV patients with drug abuse (0.12 ± 0.10 mg/kg), there was a tendency for the need of a higher dose of midazolam compared with the control group (p = 0.0754). Conclusion: Stem cell transplant recipients and selected HIV patients with drug abuse need higher doses of midazolam for bronchoscopy.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract