Clinical research increasingly relies upon the availability of appropriate genetic materials; however, the proportion of biospecimens from racial/ethnic minority patients and healthy controls are underrepresented, which preclude equitable research across all patient groups for cancer treatment. National Cancer Institute-funded Community Network Program Centers in California, Florida, and New York collaborated with local community partners to conduct three independent formative research studies with diverse (African American, Asian American, Hispanic, and White) participants to explore their knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about biobanking, and their experiences with the donation of biospecimens. Our findings demonstrated similarities in overall low knowledge and understanding about the use of biospecimens for research. This was exacerbated for nonEnglish speakers. Racial and ethnic groups differed with regard to a number of factors that are obstacles for participation, e.g., continuing medical mistrust (African Americans), lack of benefit (Hispanics), apprehension about the physical toll of donating (Vietnamese), usage of biospecimen for research (Hmong and Chinese), and suspicion of exploitation by corporate entities (Whites). However, participants uniformly reported general interest and willingness to participate in biobanking for altruistic purposes, particularly to benefit future generations. This interest was framed with a strong admonition that donations should be accompanied by transparency about study sponsorship and ownership, distribution and use of biospecimens, and study information that fit participants' backgrounds and experiences. This cross-cultural regional analysis offers significant insights into the similarities and variations in opinions and perceptions about biobanking and the collection of biospecimens for use in cancer research.

No abstract

Background Biospecimen collection from diverse populations can advance cancer disparities research, but is currently underrepresented. Methods We partnered with a community-based clinic serving Cantonese-speaking Chinese Americans to develop and revise an educational seminar on biospecimen collection. Through a randomized controlled trial (n = 395), the intervention seminar was compared with a control seminar (cancer prevention) on change in willingness to donate biospecimens. Results At baseline, many were willing to donate a biospecimen (saliva, urine, hair, toenails, blood, unused cancerous tissue) whether healthy or hypothetically had cancer. Also, many would donate because future generations would benefit, and few had concerns about donation. In logistic regression analyses, there was an intervention effect for willingness to donate: urine if had cancer [OR, 2.2; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.3–3.7], toenails if healthy (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.4–3.2) or had cancer (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 2.0–2.7), hair if healthy (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.3–2.5) or had cancer (OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.9–4.0), and unused cancerous tissue (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2–2.9). There was also an intervention effect for donating because future generations would benefit (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.4–3.0), and this attitude was a strong independent predictor for willingness to donate all biospecimens, whether healthy or had cancer (OR, 2.9–4.2). Conclusion Cantonese-speaking Chinese American participants of an educational seminar on biospecimen collection showed greater increases in willingness to donate biospecimens and donating for the benefit of future generations, than participants who attended a control seminar. Impact Donating for the benefit of future generations is a theme that should be incorporated in messages that encourage biospecimen donation for Chinese Americans.

Objective To estimate the prevalence of diabetes and pre-diabetes and the risk associated with BMI above the Asian cut-point of 23 in 4 Asian American communities. Research Design and Methods In a convenience sample of 981 Chinese, Hmong, Korean, and Vietnamese Americans in Sacramento County, California we measured hemoglobin A1c (HbAlc), height, weight, and waist circumference. Diabetes was defined as self-reported diabetes diagnosis or HbA1c ≥ 6.5%, and pre-diabetes as HbAlc 5.7%-6.4% with no diabetes diagnosis. We computed age-standardized prevalence of diabetes, pre-diabetes, and BMI and waist circumference above standard and Asian cut-points, and developed multivariable models of the association of diabetes and pre-diabetes with BMI and waist circumference. Results The 4 ethnic groups differed substantially with respect to diabetes prevalence, BMI, and waist circumference. Hmong had the highest prevalence of diabetes (15.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 10.7%-19.4%). Diabetes and pre-diabetes were associated with BMI ≥ 25 (diabetes: odds ratio [OR] =3.4, 95% CI 2.1-5.7; pre-diabetes: OR=4.0, 95% CI 2.7-5.8) or between 23 and 25 (diabetes: OR=1.8, 95% CI 1.0-3.1; pre-diabetes: OR=1.6, 95% CI 1.0-2.4). When waist circumference was added to the model, BMI effects were attenuated, and waist circumference ≥ 40 inches (men) or ≥ 35 inches (women) was associated with increased risk of diabetes (OR=3.2, 95% CI 1.6-6.2) and pre-diabetes (OR=1.7, 95% CI 1.0-2.9). Conclusions Our findings support the use of a BMI cut-point of 23 and the importance of central adiposity as a risk factor for diabetes in Asians. Diabetes risk reduction interventions for Asians are essential.