To date, little guidance exists on how to design safe and effective online programming on sensitive and/or controversial topics. Massive online open courses (MOOCs) represent a unique opportunity for delivering inclusive and accessible teaching to international learner audiences. This paper provides an insight into designing and delivering the first internationally accessible MOOC on suicide prevention in the global context in 2019-highlighting insights into best practice as well as pertinent challenges. The results from two runs of this MOOC indicate that there appears to be a global demand for education on suicide prevention. Our practice suggests that new knowledge on extremely sensitive topics such as suicide can be safely and effectively delivered through a MOOC to an international community of learners. Learner safety needs to be carefully considered when developing and delivering online learning. Thorough and careful moderation is essential to ensure that learners engage safely and sensitively with the content and with one another. The involvement of diverse stakeholders, including people with lived experience, in the MOOC design is recommended to enhance the authenticity, inclusiveness and rigour of the curriculum.
This chapter provides an assessment of studies on mobile health (mHealth) tools for development in addressing diseases relating to mental health, informs the current publications trends, identifies research gaps in the existing literature, and suggests a future research agenda that can help address these gaps. We, therefore, assessed empirical studies using a Systematic Mapping Study approach. We searched five academic databases as well as Google Search Engine and Google Scholar. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 54 full-text papers were included in this chapter. The findings suggest a growing trend in the use of various mHealth tools for mental health, such as mobile apps and text messaging. The findings also suggest that the responsibility of health monitoring and management can be shared between the medical practitioner and the patient in mental healthcare. Research gaps were identified and areas for future research are proposed.
This chapter provides an assessment of studies on mobile health (mHealth) tools for development in addressing diseases relating to mental health, informs the current publications trends, identifies research gaps in the existing literature, and suggests a future research agenda that can help address these gaps. We, therefore, assessed empirical studies using a Systematic Mapping Study approach. We searched five academic databases as well as Google Search Engine and Google Scholar. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 54 full-text papers were included in this chapter. The findings suggest a growing trend in the use of various mHealth tools for mental health, such as mobile apps and text messaging. The findings also suggest that the responsibility of health monitoring and management can be shared between the medical practitioner and the patient in mental healthcare. Research gaps were identified and areas for future research are proposed.
Abbt and Alderson remark 'how little time we spend in general practice ... perhaps 8 weeks over an entire degree' but at Imperial College London and probably at most other medical schools, this represents greater time allotted than for many other specialties. We suggest the focus in medical schools should shift towards improving the quality of general practice placements and promoting the integration of primary care and specialist teaching, rather than consuming more time in an already overstretched curricula.We feel that prestige has never been the main incentive for pursuing a specialty. Our own experience is that many medical students are attracted to a career in general practice because of other factors, such as a good work-life balance, continuity of care and career flexibility. With many GPs now concerned about their workload, this inevitably influences students and junior doctors in their career choices.2 Another key factor is the funding that a specialty receives: recently, the proportion of the NHS budget spent on primary care has decreased and the income of GPs has fallen. To recruit more GPs, medical schools should improve the quality of students' experiences in their primary care placements. However by itself, this will not be sufficient to improve recruitment and the onus falls upon the NHS to once again make general practice a rewarding career for doctors. Physical health indicators in sMIWe are grateful to Mitchell and Hardy for highlighting their recent publication in Psychiatric Services. 1 We agree that we should have cited this paper in our article in the October BJGP, but we were unaware of it (possibly because it was published around the same time that we were preparing our manuscript for submission). For this omission we unreservedly apologise.However, we do not entirely agree that our UK-wide comparisons of QOF data were 'almost identical' to their work. Although there are obviously some similarities in these papers because both made use of the same publicly-available QOF databases, our paper is different in a number of important regards.Our analyses were cross-jurisdictional, with data from Scotland, Northern Ireland, Wales and England (Mitchell and Hardy considered only England). We specifically calculated population achievement rates, along with payment and exception rates, and reported differences in rates using a sign test, while Mitchell and Hardy calculated differences in achievement rates before and after exclusions only, using c 2 tests at a patient level. Mitchell and Hardy compared screening for BMI, blood pressure (BP), cholesterol and HbA1c/glucose between those with severe mental illness (SMI) and those with diabetes. We compared BMI in diabetes versus BMI in SMI, and also BP in chronic kidney disease versus BP in SMI. We agree wholeheartedly that we need new approaches to addressing health inequalities in SMI. Analysing routine data across the UK in coming years will remain very important.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.