No abstract

A new imidazoline I2 receptor ligand, CR4056, is effective for chronic inflammatory pain and diabetic neuropathy. However, it is unclear whether other I2 receptor ligands have similar effects and whether antinociceptive tolerance develops with repeated treatment. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACHThe Von Frey filament test was used to measure mechanical hyperalgesia and the plantar test to measure thermal hyperalgesia in rats injected with complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA) treatment or had undergone surgery to induce chronic constriction injury (CCI), models of inflammatory pain and peripheral neuropathic pain respectively. The effects of morphine and I2 receptor ligands, 2-BFI, BU224, tracizoline and CR4056, 3.2-32 mg·kg −1 , i.p., on hyperalgesia or affective pain (as measured by a place escape/avoidance paradigm) were studied in separate experiments. KEY RESULTSMorphine and the I2 receptor ligands (2-BFI, BU224 and tracizoline) all dose-dependently attenuated mechanical and thermal hyperalgesia in CFA-treated rats. The anti-hyperalgesic effects of 2-BFI in CFA-treated and CCI rats were attenuated by the I2 receptor antagonist idazoxan. The combination of 2-BFI and morphine produced additive effects against mechanical hyperalgesia in CFA-treated rats. Repeated treatment (daily for 7-9 days) with 2-BFI or CR4056 did not produce antinociceptive tolerance in CFA-treated or CCI rats. Morphine and the I2 receptor ligands (2-BFI, BU224 and CR4056) were all effective at attenuating place escape/avoidance behaviour in CFA-treated rats. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONSImidazoline I2 receptor ligands have antihyperalgesic effects in rat models of inflammatory and neuropathic pain and may represent a new class of pharmacotherapeutics for the management of chronic pain. Abbreviations

Animal knockout studies suggest that trace amine-associated receptor (TAAR) 1 is involved in behavioral effects of psychostimulants such as cocaine. Recently, several highly selective TAAR 1 agonists have been discovered. However, little is known of the impact of TAAR 1 agonists on abuse-related effects of cocaine. Here, we report the effects of a TAAR 1 agonist RO5263397 on several abuse-related behavioral effects of cocaine in rats. RO5263397 was evaluated for its effects on cocaine-induced behavioral sensitization, conditioned place preference (CPP), cue- and cocaine prime-induced reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior, and cocaine self-administration using behavioral economic analysis. RO5263397 reduced the expression of cocaine behavioral sensitization, cue- and cocaine prime-induced reinstatement of cocaine seeking, and expression but not development of cocaine CPP. Behavioral economic analysis showed that RO5263397 increased the elasticity of the cocaine demand curve, but did not change cocaine consumption at minimal prices. Taken together, this is the first systematic assessment of a TAAR 1 agonist on a range of behavioral effects of cocaine, showing that RO5263397 was efficacious in reducing cocaine-mediated behaviors. Collectively, these data uncover essential neuromodulatory roles of TAAR 1 on cocaine abuse, and suggest that TAAR 1 may represent a novel drug target for the treatment of cocaine addiction.

Pain and depression are two highly prevalent and deleterious disorders with significant socioeconomic impact to society. Clinical observations have long recognized the co-existence and interactions of pain and depression. However, the underlying mechanisms of pain-depression comorbidity and their dynamic interactions remain largely unknown. Preclinical animal studies may provide critical information for the understanding of this important comorbidity. This review analyzed the current preclinical evidence of interactions between pain and depression, which generally supports the causative relationship of the two conditions. In addition, the analysis proposed to apply domain interplay concept in future model development of pain-depression comorbidity and mechanism studies. The application of spectrum-centered animal models will better the understanding of pain-depression dyad and foster the development of more effective therapeutic strategies.

Rationale-Opioid receptor agonists can enhance some effects of cannabinoid receptor agonists and cannabinoid receptor agonists can enhance some effects of opioid receptor agonists; however, the generality of these interactions is not established.Objective-This study examined interactions between the discriminative stimulus and antinociceptive effects of μ opioid receptor agonists and Δ 9 -tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in rhesus monkeys.Results-Neither heroin nor morphine (i.v. or s.c.) altered the discriminative stimulus effects of THC in monkeys (n=5) discriminating 0.1 mg/kg THC i.v. In contrast, THC (s.c.) markedly attenuated the discriminative stimulus effect of morphine and heroin in non-dependent monkeys (n=4) discriminating 1.78 mg/kg morphine s.c. Doses of THC that attenuated the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine in non-dependent monkeys failed to modify the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine in morphine-dependent (5.6 mg/kg/12 hr) monkeys (n=4) discriminating 0.0178 mg/kg naltrexone s.c. THC also failed to modify the discriminative stimulus effects of naltrexone in morphine-dependent monkeys or the effects of midazolam in monkeys (n=4) discriminating 0.32 mg/kg midazolam s.c. Doses of THC (s.c.) that attenuated the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine in non-dependent monkeys enhanced the antinociceptive effects of morphine (s.c.) in non-dependent monkeys. While μ receptor agonists did not alter the discriminative stimulus effects of THC, in a context-dependent manner THC altered the effects of μ receptor agonists.Conclusion-That the same doses of THC enhance, attenuate, or do not affect morphine, depending on the condition, suggests that attenuation of morphine by THC can result from perceptual masking rather than common pharmacodynamic mechanisms or pharmacokinetic interactions. Keywordsopioid; THC; drug discrimination; rhesus monkey; perceptual masking; morphine; heroin; midazolam; naltrexone; antinociception Cannabinoid receptor agonists and μ opioid receptor agonists have some effects in common (e.g. antinociception): drugs from both classes have important therapeutic effects and some are abused (e.g., marijuana and heroin). Cannabinoid and opioid systems and drugs interact under a broad range of conditions, from cellular (Rios et al. 2006) to behavioral (e.g. Haney NIH Public AccessAuthor Manuscript Psychopharmacology (Berl). Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 October 24.Published in final edited form as:Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2008 August ; 199(2): 199-208. doi:10.1007/s00213-008-1157-0. NIH-PA Author ManuscriptNIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript2007) measures of drug action. Understanding these interactions could be especially important for developing novel medications that might comprise both cannabinoid and opioid mechanisms and for understanding the factors that contribute to polydrug abuse.Especially relevant to polydrug abuse are studies on the combined effects of opioids and cannabinoids on behavioral measures that are related to and p...