Background: The key-stone-pathogen, Porphyromonas gingivalis associates not only with periodontal diseases but with a variety of other chronic diseases such as cancer. We previously reported an association between the presence of Porphyromonas gingivalis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and its progression. We now report the diagnostic and prognostic potential of serum immunoglobulin G and A antibodies (IgG/A) against Porphyromonas gingivalis for ESCC. Methods: An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to determine the serum levels of Porphyromonas gingivalis IgG and IgA in 96 cases with ESCC, 50 cases with esophagitis and 80 healthy controls. Results:The median serum levels of IgG and IgA for P. gingivalis were significantly higher in ESCC patients than non-ESCC controls. P. gingivalis IgG and IgA in serum demonstrated sensitivities/specificities of 29.17%/96.90% and 52.10%/70.81%, respectively, and combination of IgG and IgA produced a sensitivity/specificity of 68.75%/68.46%. The diagnostic performance of serum P. gingivalis IgA for early ESCC was superior to that of IgG (54.54% vs. 20.45%). Furthermore, high serum levels of P. gingivalis IgG or IgA were associated with worse prognosis of ESCC patients, in particular for patients with stage 0-IIor negative lymphnode metastasis, and ESCC patients with high levels of both IgG and IgA had the worst prognosis. Multivariate analysis revealed that lymph node status, IgG and IgA were independent prognostic factors. Conclusions: The IgG and IgA for P. gingivalis are potential serum biomarkers for ESCC and combination of IgG and IgA improves the diagnostic and prognostic performance. Furthermore, serum P. gingivalis IgG and IgA can detect early stage ESCC.

ObjectOvarian cancer is the primary cause of cancer-associated deaths among gynaecological malignancies. Increasing evidence suggests that microRNAs may be potential biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of cancer. In this study, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the global research and to evaluate the overall diagnostic accuracy of miRNAs in detecting ovarian cancer.MethodsA systematic literature search was conducted for relevant studies through July 20, 2017, in English databases (CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE), the Grey reference database and Chinese databases. Statistical analysis was conducted using OpenMetaAnalyst, STATA 14.0 and RevMan 5.3. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and other parameters were used to assess the overall miRNA assay performance using a bivariate random-effects model (BRM). Meta-regression and subgroup analyses were performed to dissect the heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the robustness of our analysis, and the publication bias of the selected studies was assessed using Deeks’ funnel plot asymmetry test.ResultsThirteen articles described 33 studies, including 1081 patients with ovarian cancer and 518 controls. The pooled results were as follows: sensitivity, 0.89 (95% CI: 0.84–0.93); specificity, 0.64 (95% CI: 0.56–0.72); positive likelihood ratio, 2.18 (95% CI: 1.89–2.51); negative likelihood ratio, 0.15 (95% CI: 0.11–0.22); and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), 13.21 (95% CI: 9.00–19.38). We conducted subgroup analyses based on ethnicity, research design, and miRNA profiling and found that multiple miRNA panels were more accurate in detecting ovarian cancer, with a combined DOR of 30.06 (95% CI: 8.58–105.37).ConclusionPer the meta-analysis, circulating miRNAs may be novel and non-invasive biomarkers for detecting ovarian cancer, particularly multiple miRNA panels, which have potential diagnostic value as screening tools in clinical practice.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s13048-019-0482-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Whether consolidation chemotherapy (CCT) after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) helps in the treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) is controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the impact of CCT on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR) and toxicities in patients with inoperable LA-NSCLC. PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, WanFang, VIP, and CNKI were searched to identify any relevant publications. After screening the literature and completing quality assessment and data extraction, the meta-analysis was performed using RevMan5.3 software. Ultimately, 5 eligible studies with a total of 1036 patients were selected for the present meta-analysis. The results of the analysis indicated that treatment of LA-NSCLC patients with CRT followed by CCT improved OS (pooled HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.73-0.99; P = 0.03), but did not improve PFS (pooled HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.60-1.02; P = 0.07) and ORR (P = 0.26). Although it could increase the risk of grade ≥3 infection (P = 0.04), it may not increase the risk of grade ≥3 radiation pneumonitis (P = 0.09) during the CCT period. CCT after concurrent CRT may provide additional benefits in the treatment of LA-NSCLC. Although this therapeutic strategy did not prolong PFS, further assessment is warranted.

Background Surgery is the gold standard treatment for local advanced disease, while definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (DCRT) is recommended for those who are medically unable to tolerate major surgery or medically fit patients who decline surgery. The primary aim of this trial is to compare the outcomes in Chinese patients with oesophageal squamous cell cancer with locally advanced resectable disease who have received either surgery or DCRT. Methods/design One hundred ninety-six patients with T1bN + M0 or T2-4aN0-2 M0 oesophageal squamous cell cancer will be randomised to the DCRT group or the surgery group. In the DCRT group, patients will be given intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with 50 Gy/25 fractions and basic chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil regimens. In the surgery group, patients will receive neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) and standard oesophagectomy. Five years of follow-up will be scheduled for patients. The primary endpoints are 2-year/5-year overall survival; the secondary endpoints are 2-year/5-year progression-free survival, treatment-related adverse events and the patients’ quality of life. The main evaluation methods include oesophagoscopy, endoscopic ultrasonography and biopsy, oesophageal barium meal, computed tomography, positron emission tomography-computed tomography, blood tests and questionnaires. Discussion The preponderant oesophageal cancer pathology type is dramatically different in western Caucasian and Asian oesophageal cancer patients: Caucasian patients present with 80% adenocarcinomas, and Asians patients present with 95% squamous cell carcinomas. This phenomenon needs more in-depth studies to elucidate the differences in these populations. Based on the results of this study, we will show whether DCRT will benefit patients more than oesophagectomy. This study will contribute more evidence to the management of oesophageal squamous cell cancer. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02972372 . Registered on 26 November 2016. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3316-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.