Bulges are commonly believed to form in the dynamical violence of galaxy collisions and mergers. Here we model the stellar kinematics of the Bulge Radial Velocity Assay (BRAVA), and find no sign that the Milky Way contains a classical bulge formed by scrambling pre-existing disks of stars in major mergers. Rather, the bulge appears to be a bar, seen somewhat end-on, as hinted from its asymmetric boxy shape. We construct a simple but realistic N-body model of the Galaxy that self-consistently develops a bar. The bar immediately buckles and thickens in the vertical direction. As seen from the Sun, the result resembles the boxy bulge of our Galaxy. The model fits the BRAVA stellar kinematic data covering the whole bulge strikingly well with no need for a merger-made classical bulge. The bar in our best fit model has a half-length of ∼ 4 kpc and extends 20 • from the Sun-Galactic Center line. We use the new kinematic constraints to show that any classical bulge contribution cannot be larger than ∼ 8% of the disk mass. Thus the Galactic bulge is a part of the disk and not a separate component made in a prior merger. Giant, pure-disk galaxies like our own present a major challenge to the standard picture in which galaxy formation is dominated by hierarchical clustering and galaxy mergers.

More than two thirds of disk galaxies are barred to some degree. Many today harbor massive concentrations of gas in their centers, and some are known to possess supermassive black holes (SMBHs) and their associated stellar cusps. Previous theoretical work has suggested that a bar in a galaxy could be dissolved by the formation of a mass concentration in the center, although the precise mass and degree of central concentration required is not well-established. We report an extensive study of the effects of central masses on bars in high-quality N-body simulations of galaxies. We have varied the growth rate of the central mass, its final mass and degree of concentration to examine how these factors affect the evolution of the bar. Our main conclusions are: (1) Bars are more robust than previously thought. The central mass has to be as large as several percent of the disk mass to completely destroy the bar on a short timescale. (2) For a given mass, dense objects cause the greatest reduction in bar amplitude, while significantly more diffuse objects have a lesser effect. (3) The bar amplitude always decreases as the central mass is grown, and continues to decay thereafter on a cosmological time-scale. (4) The first phase of bar-weakening is due to the destruction by the CMC of lower-energy, bar-supporting orbits, while the second phase is a consequence of secular changes to the global potential which further diminish the number of bar-supporting orbits. We provide detailed phase-space and orbit analysis to support this suggestion. Thus current masses of SMBHs are probably too small, even when dressed with a stellar cusp, to affect the bar in their host galaxies. The molecular gas concentrations found in some barred galaxies are also too diffuse to affect the amplitude of the bar significantly.Comment: AASTeX v5.0 preprint; 44 pages, including 1 table and 16 figures. To appear in ApJ. High resolution version can be found at http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~shen/bar_destruct/paper_high_res.pd

We apply the axisymmetric orbit superposition modeling to estimate the mass of the supermassive black hole and dark matter halo profile of NGC 4649. We have included data sets from the Hubble Space Telescope, stellar, and globular cluster observations. Our modeling gives M • = (4.5 ± 1.0) × 10 9 M ⊙ and M/L V, obs = 8.7 ± 1.0 (or M/L V = 8.0 ± 0.9 after foreground Galactic extinction is corrected). We confirm the presence of a dark matter halo, but the stellar mass dominates inside the effective radius. The parameters of the dark halo are less constrained due to the sparse globular cluster data at large radii. We find that in NGC 4649 the dynamical mass profile from our modeling is consistently larger than that derived from the X-ray data over most of the radial range by roughly 60% to 80%. It implies that either some forms of non-thermal pressure need to be included, the assumed hydrostatic equilibrium may not be a good approximation in the X-ray modelings of NGC 4649, or our assumptions used in the dynamical models are biased. Our new M • is about two times larger than the previous published value; the earlier model did not adequately sample the orbits required to match the large tangential anisotropy in the galaxy center. If we assume that there is no dark matter, the results on the black hole mass and M/L V, obs do not change significantly, which we attribute to the inclusion of HST spectra, the sparse globular cluster kinematics, and a diffuse dark matter halo. Without the HST data, the significance of the black hole detection is greatly reduced.