Communication sounds or 'social calls' of 16 European bat species (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae) were recorded at a range of roost and foraging sites. A comparative analysis of more than 5400 individual calls for general structures and for inter-as well as intraspecific variability resulted in 50 types of calls, which differed by their specific structure and by the calling species. These types could be grouped into four different general types of calls, according to the kind and complexity of their structure, independent of the calling species. Distinct types of calls seem to have similar functions in different bat species. One general type may be used predominantly in female-infant interactions as an isolation or direction call, which serves as mutual recognition. This type of social call was also used in 'tandem flights' of pairs of bats, which might increase individual knowledge of roost sites and foraging success. A second type was used in mate attraction, and a further one in an aggressive context. The fourth one was used by hindered or distressed bats. The group of 'aggressive' calls is least variable, but the complex mating calls and isolation calls are very diverse. Species-specific sound structures were identified, which allowed a computational species distinction. The measured inter-individual variability of social calls should be significant for their functions in individual recognition. So, beyond common features concerning the frequency structure of bat social calls, interspecific differences, as well as the intraspecific variability of details of sonagraphic parameters, should elucidate the specific functions of the calls.

No abstract

Freshwater ciliates of the genusEuplotes change their morphology in response to the presence of predators. The morphological transformations limit the ability of the predators to ingest the ciliates. Induction of defensive morphology by the predatorsStenostomum sphagnetorum (Turbellaria),Lembadion bullinum (Ciliata),L. magnum, andAmoeba proteus (Rhizopoda) was studied inEuplotes aediculatus andE. octocarinatus. The results suggest the possibility of natural occurrence of predator-induced defensive morphology inEuplotes. A density of 1 predator ml was sufficient to induce significant changes in the morphology ofEuplotes. L. magnum was found at natural population densities of 5 individuals ml. Transformations can take place within 2-4 h. Morphological changes are induced by signal substances released from the predators; direct contact between prey and predators is not necessary. The extent of transformation depends on the concentration of the signal substance. The size frequency distribution of the populations only had one peak that was related to predator density. All individuals of a population ofEuplotes changed their morphology according to the predator abundance. This may reduce energy costs for the prey by prevention of unnecessary morphological changes.Amoeba proteus induces morphological changes inE. octocarinatus, but not inE. aediculatus.

No abstract

No abstract