Energy expenditure varies among people, independent of body size and composition, and persons with a "low" metabolic rate seem to be at higher risk of gaining weight. To assess the importance of skeletal muscle metabolism as a determinant of metabolic rate, 24-h energy expenditure, basal metabolic rate (BMR), and sleeping metabolic rate (SMR) were measured by indirect calorimetry in 14 subjects (7 males, 7 females; 30±6 yr Jmean±SDJ 79.1±173 kg; 22±7% body fat), and compared to forearm oxygen uptake. Values of energy expenditure were adjusted for individual differences in fat-free mass, fat mass, age, and sex. Adjusted BMR and SMR, expressed as deviations from predicted values, correlated with forearm resting oxygen uptake (ml 02/liter forearm) (r = 0.72, P < 0.005 and r = 0.53, P = 0.05, respectively). These findings suggest that differences in resting muscle metabolism account for part of the variance in metabolic rate among individuals and may play a role in the pathogenesis of obesity. (J. Clin. Invest. 1990.

To assess the validity of bioelectrical resistance (BR) in an obese population, body composition was determined by both hydrostatic weighing and by BR in 156 Pima Indian volunteers representing a wide range of body weight (46.1-202.6 kg) and body composition (11-52% fat). A predictive equation was derived by use of data on height, BR, weight, age, and sex from 130 randomly selected volunteers and was applied to the remaining 26 volunteers. When compared with the manufacturer's software, the new equation increased correlations with hydrostatic weighing for predicting percent body fat and fat-free mass (FFM) from 0.70 to 0.92 and 0.79 to 0.97, respectively. The manufacturer's software underestimated FFM by 5.3 +/- 8.6 kg (P less than 0.05) when compared with FFM derived from hydrostatic weighing whereas the new equation improved the accuracy to -0.1 +/- 3.3 kg (NS). There were no significant effects of fluid intake (700 mL) or breakfast consumption on body composition as determined by BR. BR represents a simple and accurate way to assess body composition in Pima Indians with our newly derived equation.

To investigate whether differences in metabolic rate are related to differences in muscle mitochondrial morphology and/or to differences in in vitro muscle respiration, we studied 17 healthy Caucasians, covering a wide range of body weight and composition [9 males, 8 females; body wt 96 +/- 37 (SD) kg; body fat = 28 +/- 10%]. Central and peripheral mitochondrial volume density (Vmit c and Vmit p, respectively) and the ratio of mitochondrial outer surface to volume of mitochondria (SVmit c in center and SVmit p at periphery) were determined by stereological analyses of transmission electron micrographs from samples of the vastus lateralis. There was no relationship between mitochondrial morphology or muscle respiration and 24-h energy expenditure, basal metabolic rate, or sleeping energy expenditure adjusted for differences in fat-free mass, fat mass, age, and sex. Although total body fat was not associated with muscle cell morphology, central distribution of body fat [waist-to-thigh circumference ratio (W/T)] correlated negatively with Vmit c (r = -0.58, P = 0.01), SVmit c (r = -0.59, P = 0.01), and SVmit p (r = -0.48, P = 0.05). W/T was also negatively related to muscle respiration (r = -0.59, P = 0.01). Despite the lack of relationship between metabolic rate and muscle mitochondrial morphology, central distribution of body fat is associated with lower mitochondrial density and larger mitochondria in skeletal muscle and is associated with a decreased oxidative capacity of muscle.