The effect of some organic soil amendments such as cattle, poultry and sheep manures and four insecticides nudrin 90%, selecron 72%, tracer 24% and vertmik 1.8% and their interaction on sugar beet productivity and the infestation rate of beet fly, P. mixta were carried out at Damanhour and Nubariya regions under field conditions. The results raveled that population density of P. mixta, root yield, top yield, sugar yield and quality parameters were significantly affected by all organic manures and insecticides treatments. Generally, the highest accumulative larvae of P. mixta recorded with poultry manure followed by cattle manure and sheep manure in Damanhour and Nubariya regions. Also, in two locations poultry manure gave remarkable results in suppression in root, top and sugar yields as well as sucrose and purity% compared with cattle and sheep manures. All tested insecticides in the two locations significantly reduced the population density of beet fly, P. mixta on sugar beet plants in comparison with the cheek treatment. Sugar beet plants sprayed by selecron 72% the reduction% of P. mixta population increased with the time elapsed treatment. Selecron 72% was the most effective against P. mixta followed by tracer 24%, vertmic1.8% and nudrin 90%. Also selecron 72% was ranked the first in root and top yield, however, sugar yields gained the highest value by tracer treatment. Top, root and sugar yields, T.S.S.% and purity% were significantly affected by the interaction between tested organic manure, and insecticides. The highest top, root and sugar yields were obtained with (cattle manure x selecron 72%), (poultry manure x tracer 24%) and (cattle manure x tracer 24%) treatments, respectively. However the highest values of T.S.S. and purity% were obtained with (poultry manure x tracer 24%) treatment.
Filtrates of several fungi (Arthrobotry oligospora, Dactylella brochopage, Nematochomus concurrence, Fusarium exsporium, Trichoderma harzianum and Varticillium chlamydosporium) and bacteria (Bacills cereus, B. thuringiensis, Psendornonas fluorescens and Serratia odorifera) as biocontrol agents were tested for their nematicidal against the root-knot nematode, M. javanica infecting sugarbeet plants, as well as for their effects on yield and quality parameters. These microbial filtrates were applied as soil drench at the three concentrates (50, 75 and 1000%). Results showed that all fungi and bacteria filtrates significantly reduced the numbers of nematode population and reproduction factor comparing to the check treatment. The reduction percentage of nematode counts and reproduction factor was affected by microbial filtrate type and concentration used. Enhanced reduction followed increased concentration in each microbial filtrate. Moreover, root, leaves and sugar yields, as well as quality characters (i.e. T.S.S., sucrose and purity %) were also significantly increased. Among the fungi filtrates, V. chamydosporiusm filtrate at the highest concentration recorded the maximum effect in reducing number of nematode population and reproduction factor. Also, the highest increase percentages of leaves, root, sugar yields and sucrose, T.S.S and purity% were obtained at the highest concentrations of V. chlamydosporium. In case bacteria filtrates, the highest reduction of nematode population and reproduction factor as well as, the greatest root and sugar yields increases were achieved at the highest concentration of B. cereus and S. odorifera, filtrates. Generally, the plants treated with V. chlamydosporium, B. cereus and S. odorifera filtrates had less nematode population and higher productivity of sugarbeet than those plants treated with the other tested microbial agents. In addition, these filtrates had nearly the same effect of the nematicide, Oxamyl on root-knot nematode, M. javanica. Also, these biocontrol agents are ecological sound, economical viable and partial substitutes for costly and pollution causing chemical nematicides and have been a successful instead of these chemical nematicides management strategy when used alone or in combination with other strategies.
Four amino and organic acids, L-arginine, L-glutamic (as amino acids), ascorbic and salicylic (as organic acids) solution applied as soil drench in three concentration levels to evaluate for nematicidal effects against root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne javanica infecting sugarbeet. Their effects on sugarbeet yield and its components and quality parameters were determined. All of the tested compounds reduced the number of juvenile larvae in soil, immature stages, mature females in root, final nematode population as well as reproduction factor, comparison to the check treatment. These compounds were mostly variable in their effectiveness in reducing nematode infesting or reproduction factor and enhancing plant yield and quality according to compounds type and concentration level used. Then, the percentage of reduction in nematode parameters or/and the increases in crop parameters increased by increasing the concentration level of each tested compound. The ascorbic acid was more effective in reducing nematode fecundity, final nematode population and reproduction factor followed by salicylic acid, L-arginine acid and L-glutamic acid in a descending order. Also, the ascorbic acid component showed the best results in improving leaves, roots, sugar yields and quality parameters of sugarbeet in comparison with the other tested compounds. In comparing between the effects of both ascorbic acid and nematicide, Oxamyl on nematode development and reproduction factors as well as productivity of sugarbeet, the ascorbic acid recorded reduction in juveniles larvae in soil, final population number and reproduction factor with values of 76.3, 71.6% and 2.1 fold, respectively as well as increases in root yield and sugar yield with values of 65.73 and 126.51%, respectively, however, Oxamyl recorded reduction to 73.6, 77.3% and 1.9 fold in juveniles in soil, final population number and reproduction factor, respectively as well as increases to 68.09 and 124.12% in root and sugar yield, respectively. The problems associated with nematicides application turned the workers view to focus on new strategies or use new safe components or chemicals for nematode management program. On the other hand, it was obvious from the obtain data, the
Water shortages have increased growers interest to investigate the effects of deficit irrigation (DI) levels, i.e. 25, 50 and 75% of irrigation water requirement (IWR) compared with the full irrigation level (100 % of IWR) on sugarbeet productivity and on final population size (p f) and reproduction factor (RF) of root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita, as well as on water use efficiency (WUE) at the end of growing season, under greenhouse conditions. Results showed that DI at the levels of 25, 50, and 75% of IWR decreased significantly yield characters (root and gross sugar yields) and sugar percent of sugarbeet, and increased WUE compared to full irrigation level (100%) treatment, without significant difference between 75 and 100% DI levels in root yield. The yield characters were greatly reductions at DI levels of 25 and 50% of IWR. Among the irrigation levels treatments, WUE was lowest in the 100% irrigation level and highest in the 25% irrigation level. Also, the results indicated that the p f and RF were significantly lower at irrigation levels of 25, 50, and 75% than 100% level. The 75% irrigation level caused minor reductions in root yield, gross sugar yield and sugar percent, but significantly reduced nematode infection (p f and RF) compared to 100% irrigation level. Thus, deficit irrigation to level of 75% of IWR can be utilized to the management of root-knot nematode, M. incognita infection without significant reduction in sugarbeet yields.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.