SUMMARY The prevalence of coronary artery stenoses 2 70% or left main stenosis > 50% was evaluated in 20,391 patients who underwent angiography in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study from 1975-1979. After the patients with unstable angina or myocardial infarction were excluded, the disease prevalence in the 8157 patients with definite angina, probable angina, and nonspecific chest pain was 93%, 66% and 14% in men and 72%, 36% and 6% in women (p < 0.001).The age and sex of the patients and character of chest pain were important determinants of disease prevalence and severity. Left main or three-vessel coronary disease occurred in more than 50% of middle-aged men and older women with definite angina and in more than 50% of men who had probable angina and were older than 60 years of age. In contrast, left main coronary disease occurred in less than 2% of 1282 men and less than 1% of 1397 women with nonspecific chest pain regardless of age. In this latter patient subset, less than 5% of men and less than 1% of women in each decade under 60 years had left main or three-vessel coronary artery disease.Thus, high-risk coronary disease is common in middle-aged patients with definite angina and older patients with probable angina, but is rare in patients with nonspecific chest pain. Indications and guidelines for diagnostic noninvasive tests and coronary angiography could be based on these results.

Left main coronary artery disease (i.e., .50% stenosis) was found in 1,477 of 20,137 patients in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) registry. Of these patients, 53 (3.6%) were asymptomatic. Asymptomatic and symptomatic patients were similar in regard to 1) severity of left main coronary artery stenosis (67% vs. 70%), 2) extent of proximal coronary artery disease (no differences in number of or severity of proximal stenoses), 3) left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (13 mm Hg vs. 14 mm Hg), 4) left ventricular wall motion score (9.1 vs. 8.7), and 5) number of coronary artery segments with greater than 70% stenosis (4.4 vs. 4.8). Among the asymptomatic patients, 47% received medical and 49% received surgical treatment. In the symptomatic group, 20% received medical and 78% received surgical therapy. The survival rate 5 years after surgery for treatment of left main coronary artery stenosis was 84% for the symptomatic patients and 88% for the asymptomatic patients (p=NS). Medical management of left main coronary artery disease produced a 5-year survival rate of 57% for asymptomatic patients and 58% for symptomatic patients. Within the asymptomatic subgroup, 88% of those surgically treated survived 5 years, whereas only 57% of those medically treated survived 5 years (p=0.02). Thus, for CASS patients with left main coronary artery disease, the percentage of those that were asymptomatic is low (3.6%); asymptomatic and symptomatic patients with left main coronary artery disease had no significant difference in severity of left main coronary artery stenosis, extent of overall coronary artery disease, or left ventricular function. Finally, in this nonrandomized series, survival in patients with asymptomatic left main coronary artery disease was significantly improved with surgery compared with medical management. (Circulation 1989;79:1171-1179 S everal randomized and observational studies show that the surgical treatment of symptomatic left main coronary artery disease improves survival significantly compared with medical management.1 17 Given the grim prognosis that left main disease has traditionally implied, these findings were not unexpected. However, close analysis of populations of patients with left main coronary artery disease suggests that the prognosis of From the Division of Cardiology

Accurate, noninvasive evaluation for obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) remains challenging and inefficient. In this study, 171 patients presenting with stable chest pain and related symptoms without a history of CAD were referred to 6 cardiologists for evaluation. In the prospective cohort of 88 patients, the cardiologist's diagnostic strategy was evaluated before and after gene expression score (GES) testing. The GES is a validated, quantitative blood-based diagnostic test measuring peripheral blood cell expression levels of 23 genes to determine the likelihood of obstructive CAD (at least 1 vessel with ≥ 50% angiographic coronary artery stenosis). The objective of the study was to measure the effect of the GES on diagnostic testing using a pre/post study design. There were 83 prospective patients evaluable for study analysis, which included 57 (69%) women, mean age 53 ± 11 years, and mean GES 12.5 ± 9. Presenting symptoms were classified as typical angina, atypical angina, and noncardiac chest pain in 33%, 60%, and 7% of patients (n = 27, 50, and 6), respectively. After GES, changes in diagnostic testing occurred in 58% of patients (n = 48, P < 0.001). Of note, 91% (29/32) of patients with decreased testing had low GES (≤ 15), whereas 100% (16/16) of patients with increased testing had elevated GES (P < 0.001). A historical cohort of 83 patients, matched to the prospective cohort by clinical factors, had higher diagnostic test use compared with the post-GES prospective cohort (P < 0.001). In summary, the GES showed clinical utility in the evaluation of patients with suspected obstructive CAD presenting to the cardiologist's office.

No abstract