We investigated the histamine H1- and H2-receptor function in the pulmonary and systemic circulations of sheep by in vivo and in vitro techniques. Combined H1 and H2 stimulation (by intravenous histamine) in vivo increased pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) to 435% of base line and decreased systemic vascular resistance (SVR) to 49% of base line. Selective H2 stimulation (histamine after chlorpheniramine pretreatment) decreased PVR and SVR to 86 and 82% at base line, respectively, while selective H1 stimulation (histamine after metiamide pretreatment) increased PVR to 424% of base line and decreased SVR to 64% of base line. Combined H1- and H2-antagonist pretreatment completely blocked the effects of histamine on SVR, while PVR still decreased to 85% of base line, suggesting a mild "atypical" H2-receptor response in the pulmonary circulation under conditions of resting vascular tone. With increased pulmonary vascular tone (hypoxia), histamine decreased PVR to 55% (H1-antagonist pretreatment) and to 58% (combined H1- and H2-antagonist pretreatment) of posthypoxia values, respectively, demonstrating a marked atypical H2-receptor response. In vitro, both pulmonary arterial and venous strips showed a contractile dose-response to histamine, which was blocked by the H1-antagonist pyrilamine (mepyramine). In precontracted strips, both histamine and the H2-agonists (dimaprit and impromidine) elicited a relaxant response, which was neither blocked by H1-antagonist alone nor by combined H1- and H2-antagonists. We conclude that in sheep the histamine-induced pulmonary vasoconstrictor response is mediated by H1-receptors, while the pulmonary vasodepressor response is mediated by atypical H2-receptors. The systemic vasodepressor response is mediated by both H1- and typical H2-receptors.

No abstract

Investigations have revealed important qualitative and quantitative differences between the pharmacological properties of airways (trachea, bronchus) and lung parenchyma strip (LPS). Increased sensitivity of LPS to histamine compared with sensitivity to earbaehol, and the presence of excitatory ct-adrenoeeptors in LPS are observations which are contrary to the response of an airway preparation; this renders the validity of the LPS preparation as a true airway model doubtful. The involvement of non-airway components in the pharmacological reactivity of LPS is suggested.

Spirally cut strips of ovine pulmonary vein and artery were studied in isolated organ baths and their responses to selected autacoid and autonomic agents were compared. In addition blood vessels taken from horse plasma-sensitized sheep were compared with their respective controls. Pulmonary vein and artery exhibited qualitative and quantitative differences in their autacoid and autonomic reactivity. Veins were more sensitive in responding with contractions to histamine (HIST) and carbachol (CARB) when compared with arteries. Responses of these vessels differed qualitatively to 5-Hydroxytryptamine (5HT); phenylephrine (PE) and adrenaline (ADR): arteries responded with strong contraction and veins with relaxations. Isoproterenol (ISOP) effectively relaxed veins but was either without effect or produced 10%-15% relaxations of precontracted arterial strips. Phentolamine competitively antagonized ADR and PE-induced contractile responses of arteries while on veins, ISOP and PE dose-response curves (DRCs) were shifted to the right in the presence of propranolol. Mepyramine inhibited venous and arterial responses to HIST. Comparisons between sensitized and non-sensitized sheep vasculature revealed a significant (P less than 0.05) decrease in the activity of spasmolytic agonists on veins, i.e. relaxant actions of 5HT, PE and ISOP were significantly impaired. In addition the activity of 5HT to contract pulmonary artery was significantly (P less than 0.05) increased when compared with controls. Present investigation suggests: (i) the predominance of H1-histaminergic receptors in ovine pulmonary vasculature; (ii) the preponderance of alpha and beta-adrenergic receptors in pulmonary artery and vein, respectively; (iii) that antigenic sensitization exaggerates the pathological state by causing a decrease in spasmolytic activity with a parallel increase in spasmogenic activity.

No abstract