1981
DOI: 10.1007/bf01967610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is the lung parenchyma strip a true airway preparation?

Abstract: Investigations have revealed important qualitative and quantitative differences between the pharmacological properties of airways (trachea, bronchus) and lung parenchyma strip (LPS). Increased sensitivity of LPS to histamine compared with sensitivity to earbaehol, and the presence of excitatory ct-adrenoeeptors in LPS are observations which are contrary to the response of an airway preparation; this renders the validity of the LPS preparation as a true airway model doubtful. The involvement of non-airway compo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1982
1982
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The LPS from the guinea pig [156,157], rat [158], rabbit [159], cat and dog [160], horse [161], pig [162], sheep [163], cow [164], monkey [165], and man [166], have been shown to react to a wide range of autonomic and autacoid agents. However, the use of this preparation as a true airway model has been questioned and several investigators have suggested it no longer be used for the investigation specifically of peripheral airway reactivity [156,167,168]. Nevertheless, the LPS provides a useful model for the pharmacological study of the general pulmonary anaphylactic reaction and for screening antianaphylactic compounds.…”
Section: (Ii) Lung Parenchyma Stripmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LPS from the guinea pig [156,157], rat [158], rabbit [159], cat and dog [160], horse [161], pig [162], sheep [163], cow [164], monkey [165], and man [166], have been shown to react to a wide range of autonomic and autacoid agents. However, the use of this preparation as a true airway model has been questioned and several investigators have suggested it no longer be used for the investigation specifically of peripheral airway reactivity [156,167,168]. Nevertheless, the LPS provides a useful model for the pharmacological study of the general pulmonary anaphylactic reaction and for screening antianaphylactic compounds.…”
Section: (Ii) Lung Parenchyma Stripmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is evidence to suggest that the effect of AA on the parenchymal strip preparation may not accurately reflect its action of peripheral airways (Eyre & Mirbahar, 1981). This preparation also comprises vascular smooth muscle which is thought to contribute substantially to its contractile and metabolic profile, and possibly some non-muscular contractile elements (Goldie et al, 1982).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The behaviour of parenchymal strips is believed to reflect accurately that of the peripheral airways (Lulich et al, 1976), although Eyre & Mirbahar (1981) suggest that the reactivity of this tissue is a function of airway, vascular and non-muscular contractile elements. Therefore data indicating that AA produces consistent constriction of parenchymal strips (Mitchell & Denborough, 1980) may not be of any significant relevance to airway smooth muscle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%