An open comparative study was undertaken in order to assess the efficacy and safety of a single dose of azithromycin in the treatment of community-acquired atypical pneumonia. A total of 100 adult patients with atypical pneumonia syndrome were randomized to receive 1.5 g of azithromycin as a single dose, or 500 mg once daily for 3 days. The presence of Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydia pneumoniae, Chlamydia psittaci, Coxiella burnetii, and Legionella pneumophila infection was diagnosed by serological tests. Control clinical examinations were performed 72 h, 10-12 days and 4 weeks after treatment initiation. Among 96 patients (48 in each group) who were evaluable for clinical efficacy M. pneumoniae infection was confirmed in 24, C. pneumoniae in nine, C. psittaci in five, C. burnetii in six, and L. pneumophila in five. Forty-seven patients (97.9%) in each group were cured. Side effects were observed in two patients in the single-dose group, and one patient in the 3-day group. In conclusion, a single 1.5 g dose of azithromycin may be an alternative to the standard 3-day azithromycin regimen in the treatment of outpatients with atypical pneumonia syndrome.
A total of 371 children, aged 6 months to 12 years, with acute otitis media, acute sinusitis, streptococcal tonsillitis/pharyngitis, or pneumonia were included in an open, multicenter study. Among them, 192 children were randomized to receive azithromycin for 3 days (10 mg/kg daily), and 179 for 5 days (10 mg/kg on day 1 and 5 mg/kg on days 2-5). The overall clinical cure rate was 95.7% and 96.1%, and bacteriological eradication rate 90.1% and 94.2% in the 3-day and 5-day groups, respectively. Side effects, mostly mild gastrointestinal disturbances, were observed in 5.3% of children from the 3-day, and 6.7% from the 5-day group. Only in one child (0.3%) was therapy discontinued due to vomiting. The results of this study demonstrate that 3-day and 5-day azithromycin courses have comparable efficacy and tolerability in children with respiratory infections.
c Azithromycin (AZI), a broad-spectrum antibiotic, accumulates in polymorphonuclear cells and peripheral blood mononuclear cells. The distribution of AZI in proinflammatory cells may be important to the anti-inflammatory properties. Previous studies have described plasma AZI pharmacokinetics. The objective of this study was to describe the pharmacokinetics of AZI in whole blood (concentration in whole blood [C b ]) and plasma (concentration in plasma [C p ]) of healthy subjects. In this study, 12 subjects received AZI (500 mg once a day for 3 days). AZI C b and C p were quantified in serial samples collected up to 3 weeks after the last dose and analyzed using noncompartmental and compartmental methods. After the last dose, C b was greater than C p . Importantly, C b , but not C p , was quantifiable in all but one subject at 3 weeks. The blood area under the curve during a 24-h dosing interval (AUC 24 ) was ϳ2-fold greater than the plasma AUC 24 , but simulations suggested that C b was not at steady state by day 3. Upon exploration of numerous models, an empirical 3-compartment model adequately described C p and C b , but C p was somewhat underestimated. Intercompartmental clearance (CL; likely representing cells) was lower than apparent oral CL (18 versus 118 liters/h). Plasma, peripheral, and cell compartmental volumes were 439 liters, 2,980 liters, and 3,084 liters, respectively. Interindividual variability in CL was low (26.2%), while the volume of distribution variability was high (107%). This is the first report to describe AZI C b in healthy subjects, the distribution parameters between C p and C b , and AZI retention in blood for up to 3 weeks following 3 daily doses. The model can be used to predict C b from C p for AZI under various dosing regimens. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01026064.)
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.