In this paper, an empirical formula to describe the heavy cluster decay with [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text] is the charge number of the emitted cluster) from superheavy elements is proposed. The predictions of our formula are compared with the predictions of Coulomb and Proximity Potential Model (CPPM), the predictions of Analytical Super Asymmetric Fission (ASAF) model and the predictions by UDL formula of Qi et al. Excellent agreement is found between the predictions of CPPM and ASAF models and those of the present formula. Using our formula, we have calculated the decay half-lives of various heavy cluster emission from superheavy elements leading to doubly magic [Formula: see text]Pb and compared with the predictions of CPPM. The predictions of UDL formula deviate considerably from the predictions of this formula, CPPM and ASAF model, giving much lower decay half-lives, as the order of decay half-life increases. Possible heavy cluster emissions from [Formula: see text] and 122 nuclei leading to [Formula: see text]Pb and [Formula: see text]Bi are also predicted.
Cluster preformation probability in heavy nuclei is studied using the empirical formula of Ni and Zhou [Ren. Phys. Rev. C 82 (2010) 24311]. Dong et al. [Eur. Phys. J. A 41 (2009) 197–204], and four new formulae of Santhosh et al. [Indian J. Phys. 95 (2021) 121]. The predictions of these formulae are then compared to the preformation probabilities extracted from the experimental decay half-lives using the generalized liquid drop model (GLDM), density-dependent cluster model (DDCM), and unified fission model (UFM). It has been found that except for the isospin-dependent formula of Santhosh et al., all other formulae predict much larger preformation probability than the experimentally extracted values. Further, we propose four new empirical formulae for the cluster preformation probability in heavy nuclei, and the predictions are compared to the experimentally extracted values using different theoretical models. It is found that the predictions of all the four proposed formulae are in good agreement with the predictions of various theoretical models.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.