Background and Objectives: Host recognition pathways for gram‐negative and gram‐positive bacteria comprise pattern recognition receptors among which Toll‐like receptors (TLRs) play a pivotal role. TLRs share common signaling pathways yet exhibit specificity as well. Periodontal disease is initiated and maintained in the first line by gram‐negative but also gram‐positive bacterial infection of the gingival sulcus. To date only limited information is available on whether gram‐positive and gram‐negative bacteria induce different host responses (strength or quality). Materials and methods: To elucidate these differential effects we focused on proinflammatory cytokine releases by assessing ex vivo stimulation of whole blood with heat‐killed gram‐negative and gram‐positive bacteria and thereof derived microbial products associated with distinct TLRs. Tumor necrosis factor‐α and interleukin‐8 release were measured in the supernatants by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay. In addition, innate immune responses of peritoneal macrophages from mice lacking TLR2 and TLR4 were tested. Results: We observed that gram‐negative and gram‐positive species induced distinct patterns of cytokine production. Gram‐negative species produced higher amounts of tumor necrosis factor‐α while gram‐positive species released higher amounts of the chemokine interleukin‐8. Data from TLR knockout mice and TLR‐transfected HEK cells revealed a somehow specific role of TLR4 and TLR2 for the recognition of gram‐negative and gram‐positive bacteria, respectively, an observation that goes along with the dominant recognition of the respective pathogen associated molecular patterns lipopolysaccharide and lipoteichoic acid. Conclusions: The results show that gram‐negative and gram‐positive bacterial species induce different patterns of immunoregulatory activity, which might be the result of activation of different TLRs.
Availability of different WHO-step 3 opioids has encouraged the discussion on their value and led to the concepts of opioid rotation. Rotation is suggested, when other measures fail to achieve optimal analgesia and tolerability in cancer pain treatment. Opioid use was assessed in a prospective cohort study of 412 palliative care patients from 14 inpatient and outpatient palliative care facilities in Germany. The most frequently used opioids at baseline were morphine and fentanyl. The most frequent changes in medication (N=106) occurred from oral to parenteral morphine. Only in 49 cases true switches to other long acting opioids were recorded. This is far less than expected from other reports. True switches and adverse side effects were found to occur more frequently in inpatients, while efficacy problems were more frequently recorded in outpatients. There was no correlation between the opioid used at baseline and switch frequency, but numbers of cases receiving other opioids than fentanyl or morphine were low. Reasons for and frequencies of changes in medication were found to be largely shaped by the setting reflecting patients' needs and clinical necessities. Recommendation of first line therapy and availability of opioid formulations define the frequency of opioid use. This impedes evaluation of specific differences between the opioids.
To improve quantitative assessment of motor unit recruitment by standard concentric needle electromyography (CNEMG), hypothenar muscles of 22 healthy subjects, 18 with denervation, and 10 with a myopathy were studied. Discharge rates of motor units were measured in CNEMG recordings comprising action potentials of, at most, 4 motor units. Motor unit number estimation (MUNE) was done using the manual incremental method. In controls, the upper 95% limit of the discharge rate was 16.2/s. In all subjects, a strong nonlinear correlation between the number of motor units and the maximal discharge rate was found (r = 0.88, P < 0.0001). Increased discharge rates were found in all but one of the paretic muscles with denervation, but in none of the myopathic muscles. Measurement of the discharge rate is a simple and reliable procedure. If the discharge rate is high in a hypothenar muscle, loss of motor units can be inferred. Moreover, the discharge rate value gives an estimate of the number of motor units in that muscle. Thus, we suggest that maximal discharge rate be included in electromyographic reports. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Muscle Nerve 23: 231–238, 2000.
The authors investigated whether there was a decline in infants sleeping prone and other modifiable risk factors for sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) in Germany, where, as in some other countries, no nationwide intervention campaign against the prone sleeping position had been initiated. Data were obtained from parents by mailed questionnaires in two cross-sectional studies in 1991 (n = 3,330) and 1995 (n = 3,124). Prevalence of prone sleeping decreased from 37.6% to 8.7% (p < 0.05) in the German population and from 44.1% to 32.0% (p < 0.05) in the Turkish immigrant population. Parents who laid their infants prone in 1995 were less likely to follow advice from physicians, public media, and other parents (relative risks < 0.5, p < 0.05) and were more likely to have a low educational level, to be <20 years old, to be single parents, to have two or more children, to be raised in West Germany, or to be of Turkish ethnicity. Although the information on prone sleeping being a risk factor for SIDS became known among the population, these data suggest that subgroup-specific public intervention campaigns may be needed to reduce the prevalence of prone sleeping even further in those countries where no nationwide campaign has been initiated.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.