The reference values support the interpretation of 1-min STS test performance and identification of subjects with decreased lower body muscular strength and endurance.

BackgroundThe Swiss health ministry launched a national quality program ‘QualiCCare’ in 2011 to improve health care for patients with COPD.The aim of this study is to determine whether participation in the COPD quality initiative (‘QualiCCare’) improves adherence to recommended clinical processes and shows impact on patients’ COPD care and on the impact of COPD on a person's life.MethodsCAROL is a cluster-randomized controlled trial with randomization on the general practioner (GP) level. Thirty GPs will be randomly assigned to equally sized intervention group or control group.Each GP will approach consecutively and regardless of the reason for the current consultation, patients aged 45 years or older, with a smoking history of ≥ ten pack-years (PY). Patients with confirmed (by spirometric evaluation) COPD will be included in the study. GPs in the intervention group will receive ‘QualiCCare’ education, which addresses knowledge, decision-making and behavioural aspects as well as delivery of care according to COPD quality indicators and evidence-based key elements. In the control group, no educational intervention will be applied and COPD patients will be treated as usual. The study period is one year.The primary outcome measure is an aggregated score of relevant clinical processes defining elements in the care of patients with COPD: smoking cessation counseling, influenza vaccination, motivation for physical activity, appropriate pharmacotherapy, patient education and collaborative care. Given a power of 90% and a significance level alpha of 5%, 15 GPs recruiting eight patients each will be necessary in both study arms. With an assumed dropout rate of 20%, 288 patients will need to be included.DiscussionIt is important to develop and implement interventions that add value to COPD care considering quality and efficiency. Care pathways modifying the knowledge and behavior of physicians have the potential for improving care by transferring knowledge to clinical practice.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01921556

The pivotal objective of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) self-management programmes is behaviour change to avoid moderate and severe exacerbations and improve health related quality of life.In a prospectively planned, controlled study, COPD patients who participated in the "Living well with COPD" (LWWCOPD) self-management intervention were compared with usual care patients from the primary care COPD Cohort ICE COLD ERIC, who did not receive self-management intervention (NCT00706602) The primary outcome was behaviour change and disease-specific health related quality of life after 1 year. Secondary end-points included exacerbation rates. We calculated mixed linear, zero-inflated negative binomial and logistic regression models and used propensity scores to counteract confounding.467 patients, 71 from the LWWCOPD and 396 from the usual care cohort, were included. The differences between intervention and control were 0.54 (95% CI 0.13-0.94) on the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire domain "mastery", 0.55 (95% CI 0.11-0.99) on "fatigue", 0.54 (0.14-0.93) on "emotional function" and 0.64 (95% CI 0.14-1.14) on "dyspnoea". The intervention considerably reduced the risk of moderate and severe exacerbations (incidence rate ratio 0.36, 95% CI 0.25-0.52).Self-management coaching in primary care improves health-related quality of life and lowers exacerbation rates and health care use.

Leistungsmessgrössen in der Grundversorgung von Patienten mit COPD – eine Analyse Zusammenfassung. Hintergrund: Das Befolgen der Empfehlungen für ein gutes Management der chronisch-obstruktiven Lungenkrankheit (COPD) verbessert wichtige Endpunkte. Leistungsmessgrössen (LM) reflektieren die Qualität der Betreuung, dennoch existieren über die Dokumentation dieser Messgrössen bei COPD für die Grundversorgung kaum Daten. Ziel: Überprüfen der Dokumentation von COPD spezifischen Messgrössen in Grundversorgerpraxen des Kanton Zürich. Methode: Retrospektive Auswertung der Krankengeschichten von Patienten mit ärztlich diagnostizierter COPD, über einen Zeitraum von zwölf Monaten. Die Dokumentation der LM wurde durch Berechnen des Prozentsatzes der dokumentierten Parameter bewertet. Zusätzlich erfolgte ein Vergleich der LM Dokumentation mit einer Praxis, die ein strukturiertes COPD-Programm implementiert hatte. Resultate: Es wurden Daten von 115 Patienten aus 14 Praxen, davon 57% männlich, mit einem Durchschnittsalter von 68 (44–93) Jahren, analysiert. 46% waren aktive Raucher mit 56 (22–150 py) Packyears. Komorbiditäten waren in 73% der Fälle dokumentiert, der Schweregrad mit GOLD-Klassifizierung in 70% (GOLD I 11%, GOLD II 64%, GOLD III 21%, GOLD IV 4%).Gemäss Dokumentation hatten die Patienten durchschnittlich 1,4 Exazerbationen pro Jahr. Die Dokumentation der LM lag zwischen 16% (schriftlicher Aktionsplan im Falle von Exazerbationen) und 95% (Raucherstatus). Eine Dokumentation für eine Rauchstopp-Empfehlung fand sich in 74% der Fälle, für die Grippeimpfung in 49%. Eine adäquate medikamentöse Therapie und Instruktion der Inhalation war für 65 bzw. 57%, für pulmonale Rehabilitation in 27% der Patienten dokumentiert. Angaben zu einer kollaborativen und proaktiven Betreuung fanden sich bei 60 resp. 51%. Die Praxis mit dem laufenden COPD-Programm zeigte eine signifikant bessere Dokumentation (p<0,01) für alle LM ausser für die Grippeimpfung. Schlussfolgerung: In der Schweizer Grundversorgung bestehen Lücken in der Dokumentation hinsichtlich der Empfehlungen für eine nutzbringende COPD-Versorgung. Die Identifikation und Überbrückung dieser Lücken ist zentral für mehr Qualität in der Gesundheitsversorgung.

IntroductionHospitalizations because of acute exacerbated COPD (AECOPD) are a major burden to patients and the health care system. Interventions during acute and post-acute hospital care exist not only to improve short-term outcomes but also to prevent future exacerbations and disease progression. We aimed at measuring the implementation rates of acute and post-acute hospital care interventions for AECOPD.MethodsWe performed 24 months (January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2013) retrospective medical chart review of consecutive cases hospitalized to one of three public hospitals in the canton of Zurich due to AECOPD. Implementation rates of five acute care and seven post-acute care interventions were assessed.ResultsData from 263 hospitalizations (61% male, mean age 68.5 years, 47% active smokers) were analyzed. The median length of stay was 9 days (interquartile range [IQR] 6–12 days). In all, 32% of hospitalizations were caused by individuals with previous hospitalizations because of AECOPD. Implementation rates of four acute care interventions were >75% (lowest was appropriate antibiotic therapy with 56%). Compared to this, implementation rates of five post-acute care interventions were <25% (lowest was patient education and self-management advice with 2%).ConclusionThe results of this audit revealed room for improvement mainly in post-acute care interventions for AECOPD.