Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has restricted people’s activities and necessitated the discontinuation of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs for outpatients. In our hospital, CR for outpatients had to be discontinued for 3 months. We investigated the influence of this discontinuation of CR on physical activity, body composition, and dietary intake in cardiovascular outpatients. Method: Seventy-eight outpatients who restarted CR were investigated. We measured body composition, balance test, stage of locomotive syndrome, and food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) results at restart and 3 months later. We also investigated the results of examination that were obtained before discontinuation. Results: With regard to baseline characteristics, the percentage of male was 62.7% (n = 49), and average age and body mass index were 74.1 ± 8.5 years and 24.9 ± 7.0 kg/m2, respectively. Stage of locomotive syndrome and the results of FFQ did not change significantly. The one-leg standing time with eyes open test significantly worsened at restart (p < 0.001) and significantly improved 3 months later (p = 0.007). With regard to body composition, all limb muscle masses were decreased at restart and decreased even further 3 months later. Conclusions: Discontinuation of CR influenced standing balance and limb muscle mass. While the restart of CR may improve a patient’s balance, more time is required for additional daily physical activities. The recent pandemic-related interruption of CR should inspire the development of alternatives that could ensure the continuity of CR in a future crisis.

Background: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a requisite component of care for patients with heart failure (HF). We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes in outpatients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) compared to those in patients with non-HFpEF who did and did not continue a 5-month CR program. Methods: 173 outpatients with HF who participated in a 5-month CR program were registered. We divided them into two groups: HFpEF (n = 84, EF 63 ± 7%) and non-HFpEF (n = 89, EF 31 ± 11%). We further divided the patients into those who continued the CR program (continued group) and those who did not (discontinued group) in the HFpEF and non-HFpEF groups. The clinical outcomes at 5 months were compared among the groups. Results: There were no significant differences in patient characteristics at baseline between the continued and discontinued groups in the HFpEF and non-HFpEF groups except for % diabetes mellitus in the non-HFpEF group. The rates of all-cause death and hospital admissions in the continued group in both the HFpEF and non-HFpEF groups were significantly lower than those in the discontinued group. The all-cause death and hospital admissions in each group were independently associated with the continuation of the CR program. Conclusions: The continuation of a 5-month CR program was associated with the prevention of all-cause death and hospital admissions in both the HFpEF and non-HFpEF groups.